Mutilation killings

The full harvest includes eyes, ears, tongue, skin, brain, lymph nodes, heart, lungs, kidneys, pancreas, intestines, reproductive organs, anus, and all the blood.

Post outline

1. Introduction
2. The victims
3. Body parts targeted
4. The method
5. The killers
6. Why do ETs kill?
7. Why does the government kill?
   7.1 Research
   7.2 Animals used to grow antibodies
   7.3 Regenerative medicine and young blood
8. Differences: ET vs government killings
9. Lunar factors in the killings
10. Summary of main points
11. References
12. Appendix

Honey the horse, killed by ET-type mutilation on 7 Sep. 2015, UK.
Image credit: RichPlanet TV¹

“He sliced their lips back to their teeth, and their ears back to their heads, and their tails to their backs — and wherever he could get a grip on their eyelids, he would cut these back to the bone. And the horses were mutilated thus, to the extent that no further use could be got from the horses.”

A reference to ET-type mutilation killings in the Mabinogion, a collection of Welsh tales based on old Celtic legends and mythology (referred to in a video by Richard D. Hall, 2016).¹

More images of bodies (animal and human) after ET-type mutilation killings can be found via links in the references and the appendix.

1. Introduction

ET-type mutilation killings of animals and humans seem to have occurred since antiquity. In order for ETs to create humans and some of the animals, harvesting and manipulation of biological material from creatures on Earth would have been necessary. Subsequently, sources such as the Mabinogion (quoted above) suggest that ET-type mutilation killings were known to occur at some level of frequency ever since. It seems likely that this frequency was low judging by the infrequent mention of such events in our historical records.

Early documented events

1606. An account in the official records of the Court of James I of England details unexplained livestock deaths in early 1606:

“. . . about the city of London and some of the shires adjoining. Whole slaughters of sheep have been made, in some places to number 100, in others less, where nothing is taken from the sheep but their tallow and some inward parts, the whole carcasses, and fleece remaining still behind. Of this sundry conjectures, but most agree that it tendeth towards some fireworks.”²

Late 19th and early 20th centuries. During this period many ET-type cattle mutilation killings occurred in England according to researcher Charles Fort.²

1966. Animal mutilation killing cases were reported in the Upper Ohio River Valley, around Gallipolis, Ohio, according to researcher John Keel.²

1967. In this year the mutilation killings became more widely known outside cattle-raising communities after a horse named Lady died of an ET-type mutilation near Alamosa, Colorado.²

Increased frequency

Since the late 1960′s the incidence of mutilation killings has surged,³ especially since the 1970s.⁴ Due to government cover-ups it is difficult to estimate how many mutilation killings have occurred since this phenomenon became much more common. It is especially difficult to estimate how many humans have been killed in this way since the 1960s. However, available information about ET-type mutilation killing of humans, including the speed and secrecy with which government agencies remove the bodies, suggests that the number of ET-type human mutilation victims in the present era could be horrifying. This is consistent with the large number of young people who go missing each year and are never seen alive again.

Missing people

Although it seems that the remains of most mutilated animals are left at the attack site for the owner or nature to deal with, apparently the remains of most mutilated humans are either not left at the attack site or they are promptly removed by government agencies who will try to prevent the next of kin and the general public from ever knowing the truth about the victim’s disappearance (e.g. the findings of Tony Dodd⁵). Therefore, to some extent, the inexplicable disappearance of a loved one, especially if the person is young, could indicate a possible ET-type mutilation killing, particularly by the government as they seem to be doing most of the mutilation killings.

The incidence of human mutilation killings is potentially huge. Safe at Last⁶ states that about eight million children are reported missing worldwide every year, teenagers are the most common age group for abduction, but over 99% of missing children return home alive. Even if only 0.5% of those missing children are never seen alive again, that is 40,000 young people who go permanently missing world-wide every year. Depending on how many of those young people we estimate to have been victims of regular kidnapping, sex trafficking and murder, that can still leave many hundreds or even thousands of young people who were potentially victims of ET-type mutilation murders every year.

We do know for certain that the mutilation killings of animals and humans is a global phenomenon and that many thousands of ET-type animal mutilation killings have been reported around the world, especially where animals are herded.⁷

Government killers

It is shown below that the surge in mutilation killings is due to the government (more specifically, the Cabal in control of our societal levers) mutilating and killing animals (and to an unknown extent, humans) on an industrial scale.

2. The victims

A wide range of domesticated and wild animals are targeted. Domesticated animals include cattle, horses, sheep, goats, pigs, dogs and cats. Wild land animals include buffalo, bison, elk, small deer, badgers, foxes, rabbits, ground hogs and hedgehogs. Wild sea mammals include dolphins and seals. Birds are also targeted as well as humans. There is also evidence to suggest that the mutilation killers focus on certain breeds of animal, e.g. certain breeds of cattle, horses and seals.^8,9

Victims tend to be relatively young.⁷

3. Body parts targeted

Injuries vary somewhat across species, within species and across time. For example, in contrast to animals, many young human victims have had all their skin removed, a feature that was not seen in ET-type mutilation killings of young people before the government started mutilation killing. Similarly, the draining of animals and humans’ blood seems to have started (or at least become routine) since the government started mutilation killing. Evidence of government-specific mutilation killing features are discussed below under Differences: ET vs government killings.

A common mutilation pattern in cattle and sheep: jaw strip (muscle and tissue are removed down to the bone usually on one side of the jaw), removal of one or both eyes and ears, excision of the tongue deep at its root, removal of internal and external genitalia, and removal of digestive and other soft internal organs. Injuries across mutilation victims more generally include: decapitation, bifurcation (cutting into two parts) of the torso and removal of all internal organs, brains removed through small portals bored through the skull, and — in the case of seals and dolphins — deep corkscrew lacerations running along the entire length of their bodies. To some extent, soft tissue removed from victims can be characterized as being associated with the digestive, reproductive, endocrine, cardiovascular, lymphatic and respiratory systems. Finally, mutilation victims are left with little or no blood in them and there is no blood anywhere in the vicinity of the body.⁷

Sudden impact injuries

These injuries are due to victims being dropped from height after the mutilation killing or in some cases, without mutilation (as if the victim was not considered suitable for harvesting). Therefore in many cases victims are found with broken limbs, ribs, and other bones. This is associated with markedly depressed ground beneath a carcass and sometimes broken branches of trees through which the victim fell. Occasionally the carcasses of large wild animals are found in trees or entangled in high-voltage power lines.⁷

4. The method

Marked in advance

These premeditated and highly efficient attacks involve marking victims in advance. Many cattle were found to have been marked with fluorescent paint on their backs and sides in advance of the mutilation killings. This would enable the killers to shine a UV light on herds at night in order to attack marked animals.^9,10,11,12

Similarly, Richard D. Hall¹³ refers to a case in Wales involving a man and a woman parked in a car in a remote location at night. After seeing a light in the sky (a silent helicopter?) the car was covered in a white powder. The light disappeared and they promptly drove away. The history of such incidents suggests that if they had not been observant and left when they did, soon thereafter an ET-type craft would have arrived to mutilate / murder them.

There is also evidence to suggest that in some cases electronic devices are used to mark intended victims.¹⁴

Surgical features

Laser-like. Flesh looks as if it could have been cut with a laser but injuries do not show carbon residue as would occur if the tissue was exposed to the heat of a normal laser.⁷

Small holes. Internal organs are removed through portal incisions which are uniformly smooth and bloodless, with serrated edges. Similarly, brains are sometimes removed through a small hole bored through the upper skull. For example, in one incident a farmer discovered four cows with holes drilled into their skulls and the brains removed.⁷

Scientific explanation

From Andrew Johnson (2019):⁹

1. ETs informed Wilbert Smith (1910-1962, M.Sc. Electrical Engineering, ET researcher and contactee) about “binding forces,” a force to which materials are subject.
2. Although current physics does not acknowledge this type of force, under instruction from ETs Smith built a “binding meter” and successfully measured the binding forces of various materials.
3. Smith learned from ETs that binding forces can be altered.
4. Known examples of binding force alteration include the disintegration of Thomas Mantell’s plane (USA, 7 January 1948) when it entered the operational field of an ET spacecraft (this case is described in the appendix of ET spacecraft encounters, “dustification“ of the World Trade Center by means of directed energy weapons on 9/11 (see the scientific analysis of Dr. Judy Wood in her book Where Did The Towers Go?) and findings of researcher John Hutchison.
5. In Wilbert Smith’s Ottawa Address (31 March 1958)¹⁵ referred to by Andrew Johnson,⁹ it is further explained that by manipulating the three basic fields, not only can binding forces of an object be reduced, but temperature can be increased, potentially to very high levels.

Also, perhaps by means of the above-mentioned ET technology, there are many cases (some of them featured in ET spacecraft encounters) of ET craft or ETs using a torch-like device to paralyse or immobilize people at a distance. An ET or human using such technology could control their victims as required for capture and harvesting.

In summary, this ET technology can potentially explain the methods by which victims are attacked: (a) capture / control with the immobilization tool, (b) surgery involving high heat but anomalies that are inconsistent with the effects of known human technology and (c) removing organs in a stream of material by suction via small holes after reducing the binding forces of targeted organs. Perhaps the removed organs regain their original shape thereafter when bindings forces are increased.

Other features

Lack of blood, footprints or tracks at the scene, delayed decomposition, predator and scavenger avoidance of the carcass, and domesticated animals visibly agitated and fearful of mutilated carcasses.^7,9,16,17

Also, no law enforcement agency has identified anyone responsible for carrying out any of these many thousands of mutilation killings.

5. The killers

Expert analysis of ET-type mutilation killings consistently rules out natural predators or humans using known technology — but not ETs, humans using ET technology or humans working with ETs. Prior to humans acquiring (as of the 1947 Roswell spacecraft crashes) and being in a position to use ET technology for ET-type mutilation killings, all ET-type mutilation killings would have been by ETs. Further, evidence suggests that ETs (including reptilians) have continued to do some of the animal and human mutilation killings, independently of humans (no collaboration with humans).

Some authors (e.g. the literature review of Andrew Johnson, 2019⁹ ) suggest that most of the mutilation killings since the 1960s are done by humans (military personnel serving the Cabal) using ET technology.

Another view expressed on UFO websites is that a substantial amount of mutilation killings are perpetrated by Grey ETs in collaboration with humans. For example, in an online discussion of why our government and ETs mutilate cattle (2014), a reader comments, “Evil Greys and Cabal are together in this.”³

Evidence presented in ET spacecraft encounters (in the US there were Grey ETs living in underground bases and collaborating with humans, humans operating ET-type craft, and some mutilation killings by ETs who are not collaborating with humans) is consistent with all three views, i.e. some mutilation killings are done by ETs acting independently but most of these crimes are done by humans using ET technology or perhaps humans and Grey ETs working together, including Grey ETs flying some of the ET-type craft used in the mutilation killings.

Following is additional evidence concerning the ET vs human vs ET+human views.

Proof of ET technology and ETs

UFOs are consistently seen operating in the places where mutilations occur.^7,10,18,19 and farmers near Shrewsbury witnessed sheep being “lasered” by unidentified light from UFOs.¹⁸ In many mutilation cases ET-type aircraft were actually seen taking animals.¹⁰

Further, ETs themselves have been seen in relation to the mutilations. In France (1954) two small humanoid figures were seen walking toward their landed aircraft and thereafter three cows in nearby farms were found dead, with all their blood removed (this case is discussed in ET spacecraft encounters) and in Vancouver, Canada (1990) a resident saw a “little man” running in a field carrying a strange device similar to a torch.¹⁹

Physical evidence of ET-type craft at mutilation sites is similar / identical to that found at sites of known UFO landings and includes circular depressions in the ground, sometimes smaller triangular depressions suggesting landing gear, burn marks on the ground, large discoloured circular rings in the soil which defy normal vegetation growth for long periods of time⁷ and high radiation readings around a carcass.^10,20

Proof of human involvement

Human drugs in cattle

Ted Oliphant, police officer in Fyffe, Alabama, investigated over 35 cases of cattle mutilations. Between 1993 and 1997 he found non-veterinary drugs (Barbiturates, Anti-coagulants, Synthetic Amphetamines, Aluminum-Titanium-Oxygen-Silicon flakes, and Antimony) in bovine blood. These are pharmaceuticals used for humans. Consequently law enforcement agents who had thoroughly investigated cattle mutilation killings concluded that some kind of medical testing was going on.¹⁷

Unmarked helicopters

Since the 1960s unmarked helicopters (sometimes referred to as black helicopters and military helicopters) are consistently seen operating in the places where mutilations occur. The helicopters are often seen at mutilation locations both immediately before and after mutilations.^{1,7,10,12,17,20}

Observers often note that the helicopters are surprisingly quiet.²¹ This is consistent with the virtual silence of the Eurocopter Blue Edge rotor blade system.¹²

The military operate the helicopters

In 1976 a sheriff noticed that sightings of the black helicopters preceded mutilation killings of cattle by a day or two and that the helicopters were landing at the small Cache-Logan Community Airport. Late one evening, after seeing three unmarked and unusually quiet helicopters in the sky, the Sheriff’s deputy and several others rushed to the Cache-Logan airport. They saw a small airplane on the runway alongside one of the three helicopters. A man wearing coveralls left a helicopter with a shiny suitcase and gave it to the airplane’s pilot. The helicopter’s door was left open and allowed the sheriff to see “Property of U.S. Army” inscribed on the door of the helicopter. The Sheriff warned the man who had carried the suitcase that police and ranchers in the area suspected the helicopters of involvement in the cattle deaths and would shoot the helicopters down in future. After this confrontation, the unmarked helicopters were not seen again in northern Utah and southern Idaho and cattle mutilations there ceased for about five years.¹⁰

Similarly, later in 1976, a National Sheriff’s Association colleague in Texas reported that cattle mutilations in that area ceased soon after organized armed patrols began closely monitoring the unmarked helicopters.¹⁰

In 1993, on a tip-off, police officer Ted Oliphant went to a certain place in the evening and saw these helicopters where they landed to refuel (from two Chinook helicopters) in a field behind some trees. After refuelling, the helicopters were tracked to their home base, Fort Campbell, Kentucky. This event occurred in association with cattle mutilations in Sand Mountain, North East Alabama. On the basis of this evidence, Ted Oliphant suggested that many cases of cattle mutilation are actually our tax dollars at work.¹⁷

In the UK [date not given] after intelligence and military departments held secret meetings, resulting in a decision to have fighter jets on standby to pursue the unmarked black helicopters and force them to land, almost immediately sightings of the helicopters ceased for some time.¹² The helicopters are unlikely to have stopped flying after this meeting if it was not the military themselves who were operating the helicopters.

The above-mentioned four incidents show that the unmarked helicopters are (a) operated by the military and (b) part of an enormous mutilation killing operation. In other words, the government has been harvesting body parts from animals and likely also humans.

The military operate the ET-type craft

Police officer Gabriel Valdez, who served in the New Mexico State Police, pursued the criminals behind animal mutilations so hard that they eventually ceased their criminal activity in areas where Valdez was active. As a result of Valdez’ efforts, on 20 April 1979 at the Albuquerque Public Library at Albuquerque, New Mexico, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) held a conference (chaired by Senator Harrison Schmitt and attended by about 180 people) about the cattle mutilation problem. Thereafter official correspondence records that there were no further reports of cattle mutilations in Indian country since March 1979.^{11, 22, 23}

It has also been noticed²⁴ that ET-type mutilation killings seem to respect county (police jurisdiction) lines, i.e. there are human perpetrators involved. As with the helicopter operators, the ET-type craft operators show awareness that indicates human criminals are involved in operating the ET-type craft.

Other proof of human perpetrators

One night Gabriel Valdez and others approached an ET-type craft that was hovering in a pasture. The craft’s lights went out and it then flew low over their heads. It sounded like a small lawnmower motor, not the sound (e.g. whirring, buzzing) normally associated with an ET craft.⁹

In one cattle mutilation incident, a gas mask was found next to a dead animal.⁹

As ET-type craft are involved in mutilation killings, and government awareness of police and general public opposition to the killings resulted in a cessation of the killings, the implication is that the government / military is operating both the unmarked helicopters and many of the ET-type craft involved in the killings.

ETs or humans on government ET-type mutilation craft?

The discovery of a gas mask at a killing site and the man-made-sounding ET-type craft suggests that at least some of the government mutilation killings are conducted by its human employees. Considering the training of human pilots on flying disc simulators, secret human test flights of ET craft, back-engineering of ET craft, and the numerous sightings of the military’s man-made ET-type craft (see ET spacecraft encounters for details), it seems likely that (a) most if not all of the government mutilation killings since the 1980s were done by its human employees using ET technology, with (b) Grey ETs providing scientific and technological support at facilities such as those mentioned in the previous post.

As a firm date reference, an ET-type craft seen in Rendlesham Forest (UK) on 26 and 27 December 1980 is judged^9,25 to have been man-made. The craft was triangular (about 9 x 9 x 9 feet) and pyramid-like in shape. Presumably it would have been too small to contain a large animal (e.g. cow) for mutilation but perhaps it could have dealt with small animals.

In summary, it seems likely that most if not all government mutilation killings since the 1980s were done by humans but there could have been a period as of the late 1960s (when mutilation killings started to surge) until the 1980s, when the government used Grey ETs to do the mutilation killings, i.e. the government could have used Grey ETs to do mutilation killings on its behalf for a period of over ten years.

6. Why do ETs kill?

According to Philip J. Corso (1915 – 1998),²⁶ Lieutenant Colonel in the United States Army, the US Government was aware of ET-type cattle mutilations since the mid-1950s, especially in the area around Colorado. At that time it was thought that the ETs might be harvesting organs for scientific purposes (e.g. transplant into another species, or creation of a hybrid biological entity) or food (e.g. processing into a nutrient package).²⁶

Science and to a lesser extent food are still named as reasons for the ET mutilation killings. For example, non-specific references are made to humans and some animals being part of an ongoing biogenetic experiment.^10,27 In more general terms, as I suggested in ET spacecraft encounters, it seems reasonable to think of ETs’ activities on Earth, including mutilation killings, as exploitation and management of Earth’s resources for reasons that we can only speculate about at present. In contrast, there is plenty evidence to help explain why the government mutilates and kills.

7. Why does the government kill?

7.1 Research

As was noted above, Ted Oliphant found pharmaceutical evidence that indicated cattle were being used for medical testing. He elaborated by linking his findings to the nature of the mutilations:

• Every organ taken from affected livestock has to do with input, output and reproduction.
• Where entire jaws have been excised in large, oval excisions, the bone is exposed and is perfectly clean.
• The wounds have been cauterized and there is no presence of blood.
• The jaw is an important part because enzymes are produced there. Enzymes that can kill viruses and bacteria. It’s an antibody factory.
• The digestive track also acts as a filter. It absorbs, collects and stores traces of any chemical or toxin introduced.
• The rectum is a similar filter as are ears. They store traces of toxins and chemicals like a library.
• As many diseases (like CJD and BSE ) can be inherited, the reproductive system may be a good place to look for clues on how it is passed to the next generation.¹⁷

Similarly, Richard D. Hall (2016)¹ suggests that soft tissue and blood is removed in order to sample environmental effects and Andrew Johnson (2019)⁹ notes that (a) the common removal of lymph nodes from cattle is consistent with research on the effects of anthrax or similar being introduced into the cattle or the environment and (b) liver samples from a mutilated cow showed a very high level of potassium (potassium iodine is used to block radioactive iodine from entering the thyroid).

In other words, as Andrew Johnson points out, (a) in part, the military seems to have been using other peoples’ animals (and perhaps humans) to research weapons, including biological weapons and (b) the human perpetrators of animal and human mutilation killings consider themselves above the law and beyond the realm of normal ability to investigate serious crimes.

7.2 Animals used to grow antibodies

Richard D. Hall^1,14 supports this explanation of Dr. Philip Duke, who has investigated many mutilation killings:

• The animals are used to incubate certain antibodies for which the perpetrators have a future use.
• The killer targets an animal to be used as an incubator and then injects it with an agent (e.g. a virus) that causes the victim to grow antibodies against the agent.
• A certain period of time (weeks or months) is allowed to pass in order for the antibodies to become resident throughout the victim’s blood and internal organs.
• The killer then returns to harvest the antibodies in a mutilation killing.
• Dr. Duke believes that in at least some cases HIV is injected into the victim for the purpose of growing HIV antibodies.

Richard D. Hall gives an example¹ of how horses have been used in this way to grow antibodies for injection into humans to prevent their bodies from rejecting transplanted organs. Rejection is a major cause of transplant failure and antibody specific to select immune components is occasionally used to treat severe acute rejection.²⁸ In such cases the organ recipient is infused with anti-lymphocyte globulin (ALG) animal- antibodies against human T cells.²⁹

More recently the organ recipient can undergo genetic modification to deactivate genes that would otherwise cause the body to reject transplants.²⁸ Further, genetic engineering is now used to create transgenic animal systems that express human antibodies. Mice, rats, rabbits, chickens and cows have been modified to express human antibodies and therapeutic molecules derived from antibodies have become a dominant class of drugs.³⁰

Considering the well-established facts of the Cabal’s criminality and control of governments (e.g. see academic publications on the Occidental Observer, site of Prof. Kevin MacDonald), including the military (and their operation of ET-type craft for mutilation killings), it is necessary to consider the possibility that some of the Cabal’s human mutilation killings have been for the purposes of regenerative medicine and organ transplantation.

I need young blood.

7.3 Regenerative medicine and young blood

Regenerative medicine aims to replace, engineer or regenerate human or animal cells, tissues or organs to restore or establish normal function.³¹ In particular, wealthy old people use the blood of young people for rejuvenation. People have long been aware of the potential for rejuvenating old people with the blood of young people. In 1492 three young boys were used to provide a blood transfusion for Pope Innocent VIII³² and the novel Dracula (1897) by Bram Stoker features a vampire named Dracula who drinks his victims’ blood to restore his youth.³³ The origin of Count Dracula is in George du Maurier’s 1895 novel Trilby, wherein the villain of Trilby, Svengali, is an Ashkenazi jew. Bram Stoker was aware of jew evil and intensely anti-jew.³⁴

There is evidence from animal studies to suggest that infusion of young blood into older people can temporarily reverse ageing in the older people, e.g. reverse age-related cognitive decline and revitalize cartilage, muscle (including heart) and liver.^32,35 Blood plasma contains proteins, enzymes and other antibodies to control disease and ageing and a growing number of clinics offer plasma from young donors to older people who can afford the fees.³² Several companies offer young blood transfusions from 18-25 year old donors and charge from $8,000.00 to $150,000.00 for the treatment.³⁵

Regardless of the ethics (e.g. exploiting poor donors) the market for young blood has expanded³⁶ and a growing number of start-up companies are intent on capturing some of the money available in this industry.³⁷ As a reader commented under the article Can Blood from Young People Slow Ageing?³⁷ in relation to the apparently unlimited supply of young blood, “Shouldn’t law enforcement be looking into this?”

Jews and the illegal trade in body parts is discussed in the post Jews and the illegal trade in body parts.

8. Differences: ET vs government killings

My impression after studying many mutilation killing reports (articles, videos, photographs) is that the mutilations done by ETs are different to those done by the government. There are possibly also differences between the mutilations done by different ET groups (most likely sub-species of Greys and Reptilians), depending on their objectives. However these seem to be distinguishing characteristics of government mutilation killings:

Removal of more organs from young victims

If a human victim is young (adolescence or early adulthood) it seems that more of the organs are missing, including all the skin. The total removal of young humans’ skin seems to have occurred in the Dalby Forest (UK, 1980s or early 1990s) cases reported by Tony Dodd⁵ and it occurred in the Brecon Beacons case (UK, 20 Aug 1990) reported by Richard D. Hall.¹³ On this point, skin grafts are done for a variety of reasons (e.g. infection, burns, ulcers, breast reconstruction) and the skin of unrelated people (allograft) can be grafted onto patients.³⁸ It is notable that since the Cabal started doing ET-type mutilation killings, at least one young female victim was found with her breasts cut off and missing.¹³

This is in contrast to the first documented incident of human mutilation killing that (a) involved autopsy and (b) unequivocally met the criteria for ET-type mutilation killing. In that case nine young Russian hikers were killed on 1 and 2 February 1959 (before the government started mutilation killing). Two of the bodies were missing eyes, one was missing the tongue and one was missing the eyebrows. There was no extensive skin removal and no blood removal reported. See the appendix for more information on this case.

Blood removal

In contrast to the above-mentioned Russian case of no human blood removal and the early documented cases (e.g. the above-mentioned unexplained livestock deaths in 1606) that do not mention blood removal, blood removal is a typical feature of animal and human mutilations since the government started doing these crimes.

Respect for the bodies of dead humans

As in many ET-type mutilation killings, the bodies of the above-mentioned young Russians showed sudden impact injuries, i.e. the ETs simply dumped the bodies from a height when they had finished with them, as they would do with animals. Although evidence indicates that the government also dumps animals from a height after harvesting, I am not aware of any evidence to suggest that the government has dumped human bodies from a height. On the contrary, human remains (e.g. the bodies of a young man and woman in the Brecon Beacons case discussed by Richard D. Hall¹³) seemed to have been placed carefully on the ground. This distinction between the treatment of animals vs humans is consistent with human killers showing at least some respect for their own kind, especially as the killers in the ET-type craft were likely not jews.

Murder disguised as mutilation killing?

The ET-type mutilation killing of a 36 year-old professor of Agroecology in Brazil on 27 June 2019 has features that suggest the primary motive could have been murder. Apparently neighbours saw two men leaving the professor’s home and driving off in his car around the time he went missing. The professor was known to be an assertive person and his work in ecology could have brought him into conflict with the interests of big money. The ET-style mutilation killing could have been a way of humans murdering him while feeling safe in the knowledge that no-one has ever been found guilty of an ET-type mutilation killing, animal or human. For those with access to the required technology, ET-type mutilation killing could be a preferred assassination method in some cases. See the appendix for more information on this case.

9. Lunar factors in the killings

For the reasons given in ET spacecraft encounters, an association could be expected between the dates of genuine ET mutilation killings and lunar factors. However as it seems unlikely that the timing of government mutilation killings (the majority of the killings) would be influenced by considerations of energy availability in the natural environment (government ET-type craft could meet their energy requirements from their bases on Earth) we might see an association between the dates of government mutilation killings and lunar factors due to lunar influences on the physiology of victims.

Lunar cycles are among the more important natural factors that regulate health and reproduction of vertebrates³⁹ although light pollution is a global problem affecting both terrestrial and marine environments. Increased light pollution can help explain why early studies found circalunar rhythms in vertebrates while some of the more recent studies did not find such a relationship.⁴⁰ Nonetheless, there is evidence of lunar influences on the physiology of humans and other mammals, including other primates, badgers⁴⁰ and cattle. Spontaneous birth frequency of cows increased uniformly from new moon to full moon phase and decreased until the waning crescent phase.⁴¹

Human scientists involved in planning the mutilation killings would know about the lunar influence on physiology. To control for possible confounding factors (e.g. differences between breeds and species, and lunar influences) in their research, we could expect to see indications of the scientists holding such variables constant. As was noted above under The victims, certain types of animals (particularly breeds of cattle and horses; species of seal) are targeted. This is consistent with what would be expected in scientific research. Similarly, we could expect to see some consistency of mutilation killings in relation to the moon. Apart from experimental control of unwanted influences, we might also see consistency on some factors for reasons of the desired product, e.g. quality, quantity and uniformity (of blood components and state of other body parts that vary across animals, humans and with lunar factors).

On the basis of the above, I analysed the dates of the 81 ET-type mutilation killings in relation to phases of the Moon and the Moon’s perigee – apogee cycle using the method stated in ET spacecraft encounters.

9.1 Findings

ET-type mutilation killings: Lunar cycle and phase

Figure 1a. No. of mutilation killings per day across lunar cycle.
Figure 1b. No. of mutilation killings per lunar phase.

Fewest mutilation killings occurred during First Quarter and most mutilation killings occurred during Last Quarter. The Chi^2 value for the difference between these two phases is 0.641. The p-value is .42334, i.e. the result is not significant at p < .05. This finding indicates that ET-type mutilation killings were not more likely to occur during Last Quarter than First Quarter.

Summary: ET-type mutilation killings by lunar phase

The ET-type mutilation killings were not significantly more likely to occur during any particular lunar phase.

ET- type mutilation killings: Perigee-apogee cycle and lunar phase

Figure 2a. No. of mutilation killings per day across perigee-apogee cycle.
Figure 2b. No. of mutilation killings by lunar phase and closest point (perigee or apogee) in perigee-apogee cycle.

In Figure 2a light blue shading demarcates the cases that occurred closer to perigee from those that occurred closer to apogee. Notable feature of this chart: More cases occurred closer to perigee than closer to apogee. The Chi^2 value for the difference between these two groups is 7.716. The p-value is .00547. The difference is significant at p < .01.

In Figure 2b yellow shading highlights the biggest differences between certain lunar phase and perigee-apogee categories. The Chi^2 and p-values for the differences between these groups:

First Quarter with the Moon closer to Perigee vs First Quarter with the Moon closer to Apogee (Chi^2 value 2.882, p-value .08956). Although this difference is not significant at p < .05, it approaches significance at that level.

First Quarter with the Moon closer to Apogee vs Full Moon with the Moon closer to Perigee (Chi^2 value 4.263, p-value .03895). This difference is significant at p < .05.

Full Moon with the Moon closer to Perigee vs Full Moon with the Moon closer to Apogee (Chi^2 value 2.333, p-value .12663). Although this difference is notable, it is not significant at p < .05.

Full Moon with the Moon closer to Apogee vs Last Quarter with the Moon closer to Perigee (Chi^2 value 1.8, p-value .17971). This difference is not significant at p < .05.

New Moon with the Moon closer to Perigee vs New Moon with the Moon closer to Apogee (Chi^2 value 2.333, p-value .12663). Although this difference is notable, it is not significant at p < .05.

Summary: Perigee-apogee and lunar phase findings

The ET-type mutilation killings were significantly more likely to occur when the Moon was closer to Earth (closer to Perigee). Across all lunar phases most mutilation killings occurred when the moon was closer to Earth, with this difference approaching or reaching statistical significance in some comparisons.

The above finding is opposite to that of ET spacecraft sightings (presented in ET spacecraft encounters) as is shown in Figure 3.

ET craft sightings vs ET- type mutilation killings: Perigee-apogee cycle and lunar phase

Figure 3. ET craft sightings vs ET-type mutilation killings: No. of cases by lunar phase and closest point (perigee or apogee) in perigee-apogee cycle.

There was a tendency for the ET craft to be seen when the Moon was further from Earth (closer to Apogee), particularly during Last Quarter and New Moon. However, ET-type mutilation killings were more likely to occur when the Moon was closer to Earth (closer to Perigee).

Interpretation of the lunar findings

The lunar findings support this view:

• ET craft operators have different considerations (e.g. energy, as was noted in ET spacecraft encounters) to those (e.g. scientific and harvested product considerations) of ET-type mutilation killing craft operators.
• Most ET-type mutilation killings were perpetrated by humans operating from bases on Earth. If this was not the case, the dates of ET craft sightings (analysed in ET spacecraft encounters) and ET-type mutilation killings would likely show a similar pattern in relation to the lunar factors. However the pattern is opposite — ET craft were more likely to be seen when the Moon was further from Earth and mutilation killings were more likely to occur when the Moon was closer to Earth.
• The lunar findings are consistent with human researchers holding perigee – apogee effects on targets’ physiology constant by killing / harvesting near perigee.
• The lunar findings are also consistent with humans killing / harvesting when the body parts are most suitable — assuming that the blood and other body parts are in a more suitable state at perigee rather than apogee.

10. Summary of main points

1. ET-type mutilation killings of animals and humans have surged since the late 1960′s.
2. ET-type mutilation killings are a global problem that includes the murder of young people for their body parts.
3. The incidence of missing young people suggests that the incidence of ET-type murder of young people for their body parts could be high.
4. Repeated and reliable observation of humans involved in perpetrating ET-type mutilation killings and other evidence of human responsibility for these crimes indicates that since the late 1960s, most ET-type mutilation killings have been done by the government, i.e. the Cabal in control of our societal levers.
5. There seem to be significant differences between ET and Cabal mutilation killings on body parts targeted, the amount of body parts harvested, and treatment of human remains.
6. There is speculation about why ETs harvest animal and human body parts, including the possibilities of science (e.g. creating a hybrid biological entity) and food (nutrition for the ETs).
7. The Cabal mutilation killings are consistent with their publicly-declared transhumanist (“Great Reset,” New World Order, brutal world government by jews) ambitions, including mutilation killings for research, antibodies, and (in cases of human mutilation killings) regenerative medicine and young blood, and organ transplantation.
8. In addition to the proof of Cabal perpetration of most mutilation killings since the 1960s, it is notable that the Cabal’s ET-type mutilation killings are similar to their ritual mutilation killings of Christians and some of their other murders, e.g. extreme torture; draining of blood; puncture wounds; excision of body parts including breasts, genitals, tongue, heart; mutilating eyes; cutting muscles; beheading and dismembering(Jews’ ritual mutilation murder of non-Jews).
9. In some ways the remains of Cabal mutilation killing victims since the 1960s look as if instead of knives and traditional jewish butchering skills, the killers had ET technology and new objectives, e.g. sinister science and profit in the regenerative medicine and organ transplantation markets.
10. Known ET technology can help explain the methods by which victims are captured / controlled and operated on, including the removal of organs through small holes.
11. The analysis of ET-type mutilation killings in relation to lunar factors, and the comparison of these findings to those of ET craft sightings, adds weight to the conclusion that the Cabal has done most of the ET-type mutilation killings of animals and humans since the 1960s.

11. References

1. Hall, Richard D. (2016). The UK animal mutilation cover up, Part 3 of 3, RichPlanet TV.
2. Hurley, Matt (2021). Animal mutilation mystery.
3. Haven, Lisa (2014). Secret files exposed: Why UFO and Government mutilate cattle, Before It’s News, 5 April 2014.
4. Cattle mutilation & related reports & data (2009). Alien Hub, 22 Nov 2009.
5. Hall, Richard D. (2014). The human mutilation cover up, Part 1 of 3, RichPlanet TV.
6. The truth about child abduction statistics in 2022 (2022), Safe at Last, 15 March 2022.
7. Vander Ploeg, Dirk (2014). More significant observations relating to animal mutilations — Part II, UFO Digest, 22 March 2014.
8. RichPlanet TV search results for: mutilations.
9. Johnson, Andrew (2019). Acknowledged: A perspective on UFOs, Aliens and Crop Circles.
10. Animal Mutilations, Crystalinks.
11. Cattle5.pdf, UFO Casebook.
12. Lowth, Marcus (2018). What are the Black Helicopter conspiracies? UFO Insight, 21 Nov 2018.
13. Hall, Richard D. (2011). Derek Gough 2011 interview, Part 1 of 1, RichPlanet TV.
14. Hall, Richard D. (2010). Silent killers in Sussex, Part 3 of 4, RichPlanet TV.
15. Smith, Wilbert (31 March 1958). The Ottawa Address.
16. Strickler, Lon (2011). Animal mutilations in Wales, Phantoms and Monsters, 31 Aug 2011.
17. Cattle mutilation reports, MUFON.
18. Andrews, Colin (2010). Unexplained sheep attacks ’caused by aliens in UFOs‘, 5 Apr 2010.
19. Lowth, Marcus (2017). Human cattle mutilation: The grim and chilling claims, UFO Insight, 1 Mar 2017.
20. Bonham, Nick (2013). Cattle mutilations: Aliens? The Pueblo Chieftain, 14 Jul 2013.
21. Animal mutilations: A worldwide phenomena, NOUFORS.
22. Cattle3.pdf, UFO Casebook.
23. Cattle4.pdf, UFO Casebook.
24. Sputnik (2000). Cattle mutilation, Everything2, 8 Aug 2000.
25. Hall, Richard D. (2010). Animal mutilation mystery, Part 2 of 3, RichPlanet TV.
26. Corso, Philip J. (1997). The day after Roswell.
27. Reddit (2022).Why do aliens mutilate cattle?
28. Wikipedia: Transplant rejection
29. Wikipedia: Anti-lymphocyte globulin
30. Chen, W.C. and Murawsky, C.M. (2018). Strategies for generating diverse antibody repertoires using transgenic animals expressing human antibodies, Front. Immunol., 07 March 2018.
31. Wikipedia: Regenerative medicine
32. “New Blood” – Young plasma replacement for longevity and anti-aging, Asher Longevity Institute.
33. Wikipedia: Dracula: Major themes
34. Pennington, Rosemary W. (2020). The jewish origin of Bram Stoker’s Count Dracula, National Vanguard, 1 August, 2020.
35. Young Blood Antiaging
36. Knoepfler, Prof. Paul, Ph.D (2017). Young blood as anti-aging fountain of youth: hype or hope? The Niche, 20 August 2017.
37. Piore, Adam (2021). Can blood from young people slow aging? Newsweek, 7 Apr 2021.
38. Scott, Julie (2022). Skin graft: Everything you need to know, Verywell Health, 15 Aug 2022.
39. Norris, D.O. & Carr, J. A. (2021). Environmental endocrinology of vertebrates, in Vertebrate Endocrinology (Sixth Ed.), Ch. 15, pp 527-568.
40. Raible, F., Takekata, H. & Tessmar-Raible, K. (2017). An overview of monthly rhythms and clocks, Front. Neurol., 12 May 2017.
41. Yonezawa, T., Uchida, M., Tomioka,M. & Matsuki, N. (2016). Lunar cycle influences spontaneous delivery in cows, PLOS, 31 August 2016.

12. Appendix

List of 81 ET-type mutilation killing reports
[A 107 kB text file of 40 pages for download]