Tag: ufos

  • Starchild and J-Rod

    Starchild and J-Rod


    The Starchild skull and J-Rod

    The Starchild skull

    The Starchild skull is a 900 year-old bone skull of a Short Grey ET . It was found in Mexico in the 1930s. Scientific analysis of the skull proves beyond any reasonable doubt that it is not human.1 Andrew Johnson (2019) presents detailed factual information about the Starchild skull as of page 264 in Acknowledged: A perspective on UFOs, Aliens and Crop Circles.1 In contrast, Wikipedia offers a blatant cover-up on this subject. For educational videos about this fascinating skull, see the presentations of Lloyd Pye2 and Andrew Johnson.3

    J-Rod

    The image of J-Rod featured above is a sketch by Bill Uhouse of the Short Grey ET (J-Rod, wearing a human man’s shirt at a meeting in the 1970s or early 1980s) with whom he worked. The image is from Linda Moulton Howe via Stealth Skater.4

    Bill Uhouse (1924 – 2009)

    Bill Uhouse was a fighter pilot in the Marine Corps who subsequently worked on flight simulators as a mechanical avionics engineer for 37 years as of 1954.5,6 From 1958 to 1988 he worked specifically on “flying disc simulators” in which certain US Air Force pilots trained. The simulators were based on a 30-metre wide ET craft presented to the US government by ETs in 1953, in Kingman, Arizona. The craft was then taken to Area 51 and the four ETs on board went to Los Alamos National Laboratory in northern New Mexico for study by scientists. The difference between this aircraft and other discs that the US had examined was that this craft was a much simpler design. The first flying disc simulator was functional by about 1958 and it was put into operation as of about 1962 or 1963.

    The technical advisor on the flying disc simulator project was a Short Grey ET (about 4 feet 9 to 5 feet tall), originally from the Zeta Reticulum star system. This ET became known as J-Rod. He had been working with a secret agency of the US government since 1953 at Los Alamos National Laboratory and in a secret underground facility called Site 4 (S-4), which is inside the Papoose Mountains near Groom Lake, Area 51 and Nellis AFB. In effect J-Rod was head of the flying saucer simulator project.5

    At least two J-Rods were known to be working for the US at that time: one was located at Los Alamos National Laboratory and the other at S-4.5

    From an interview6 with Bill Uhouse in 2000:

    ETs can actually speak. J-Rod spoke like a parrot and sounded human. However he might not understand a question unless it was put on paper and explained. J-Rod could answer questions that even our top mathematicians could not answer. J-Rod’s skin was pinkish and a little bit rough.

    References

    1. Johnson, Andrew (2019). Acknowledged: A perspective on UFOs, Aliens and Crop Circles.
    2. Pye, Lloyd (2012). The Starchild skull.
    3. RichPlanet TV (2017). Starchild Skull & NATO Facility, 29 July 2017.
    4. Moulton Howe, Linda (2002). Two scientists describe an extraterrestrial biological entity called J-Rod, Stealth Skater, 19 Feb 2004.
    5. Bill Uhouse: Mechanical avionics engineer, Area 51 disc simulator designer. UFO Research Network, 6 Nov 2010.
    6. Bill UHouse Interview: UFOs, Aliens, Area 51 and J-Rod (2000), YouTube.

  • Mutilation killings

    Mutilation killings

    The full harvest includes eyes, ears, tongue, skin, brain, lymph nodes, heart, lungs, kidneys, pancreas, intestines, reproductive organs, anus, and all the blood.

    Post outline

    1. Introduction
    2. The victims
    3. Body parts targeted
    4. The method
    5. The killers
    6. Why do ETs kill?
    7. Why does the government kill?
      7.1 Research
      7.2 Animals used to grow antibodies
      7.3 Regenerative medicine and young blood
    8. Differences: ET vs government killings
    9. Lunar factors in the killings
    10. Summary of main points
    11. References
    12. Appendix


    Honey the horse, killed by ET-type mutilation on 7 Sep. 2015, UK.
    Image credit: RichPlanet TV1

    “He sliced their lips back to their teeth, and their ears back to their heads, and their tails to their backs — and wherever he could get a grip on their eyelids, he would cut these back to the bone. And the horses were mutilated thus, to the extent that no further use could be got from the horses.”

    A reference to ET-type mutilation killings in the Mabinogion, a collection of Welsh tales based on old Celtic legends and mythology (referred to in a video by Richard D. Hall, 2016).1

    More images of bodies (animal and human) after ET-type mutilation killings can be found via links in the references and the appendix.

    1. Introduction

    ET-type mutilation killings of animals and humans seem to have occurred since antiquity. In order for ETs to create humans and some of the animals, harvesting and manipulation of biological material from creatures on Earth would have been necessary. Subsequently, sources such as the Mabinogion (quoted above) suggest that ET-type mutilation killings were known to occur at some level of frequency ever since. It seems likely that this frequency was low judging by the infrequent mention of such events in our historical records.

    Early documented events

    1606. An account in the official records of the Court of James I of England details unexplained livestock deaths in early 1606:

    “. . . about the city of London and some of the shires adjoining. Whole slaughters of sheep have been made, in some places to number 100, in others less, where nothing is taken from the sheep but their tallow and some inward parts, the whole carcasses, and fleece remaining still behind. Of this sundry conjectures, but most agree that it tendeth towards some fireworks.”2

    Late 19th and early 20th centuries. During this period many ET-type cattle mutilation killings occurred in England according to researcher Charles Fort.2

    1966. Animal mutilation killing cases were reported in the Upper Ohio River Valley, around Gallipolis, Ohio, according to researcher John Keel.2

    1967. In this year the mutilation killings became more widely known outside cattle-raising communities after a horse named Lady died of an ET-type mutilation near Alamosa, Colorado.2

    Increased frequency

    Since the late 1960′s the incidence of mutilation killings has surged,3 especially since the 1970s.4 Due to government cover-ups it is difficult to estimate how many mutilation killings have occurred since this phenomenon became much more common. It is especially difficult to estimate how many humans have been killed in this way since the 1960s. However, available information about ET-type mutilation killing of humans, including the speed and secrecy with which government agencies remove the bodies, suggests that the number of ET-type human mutilation victims in the present era could be horrifying. This is consistent with the large number of young people who go missing each year and are never seen alive again.

    Missing people

    Although it seems that the remains of most mutilated animals are left at the attack site for the owner or nature to deal with, apparently the remains of most mutilated humans are either not left at the attack site or they are promptly removed by government agencies who will try to prevent the next of kin and the general public from ever knowing the truth about the victim’s disappearance (e.g. the findings of Tony Dodd5). Therefore, to some extent, the inexplicable disappearance of a loved one, especially if the person is young, could indicate a possible ET-type mutilation killing, particularly by the government as they seem to be doing most of the mutilation killings.

    The incidence of human mutilation killings is potentially huge. Safe at Last6 states that about eight million children are reported missing worldwide every year, teenagers are the most common age group for abduction, but over 99% of missing children return home alive. Even if only 0.5% of those missing children are never seen alive again, that is 40,000 young people who go permanently missing world-wide every year. Depending on how many of those young people we estimate to have been victims of regular kidnapping, sex trafficking and murder, that can still leave many hundreds or even thousands of young people who were potentially victims of ET-type mutilation murders every year.

    We do know for certain that the mutilation killings of animals and humans is a global phenomenon and that many thousands of ET-type animal mutilation killings have been reported around the world, especially where animals are herded.7

    Government killers

    It is shown below that the surge in mutilation killings is due to the government (more specifically, the Cabal in control of our societal levers) mutilating and killing animals (and to an unknown extent, humans) on an industrial scale.

    2. The victims

    A wide range of domesticated and wild animals are targeted. Domesticated animals include cattle, horses, sheep, goats, pigs, dogs and cats. Wild land animals include buffalo, bison, elk, small deer, badgers, foxes, rabbits, ground hogs and hedgehogs. Wild sea mammals include dolphins and seals. Birds are also targeted as well as humans. There is also evidence to suggest that the mutilation killers focus on certain breeds of animal, e.g. certain breeds of cattle, horses and seals.8,9

    Victims tend to be relatively young.7

    3. Body parts targeted

    Injuries vary somewhat across species, within species and across time. For example, in contrast to animals, many young human victims have had all their skin removed, a feature that was not seen in ET-type mutilation killings of young people before the government started mutilation killing. Similarly, the draining of animals and humans’ blood seems to have started (or at least become routine) since the government started mutilation killing. Evidence of government-specific mutilation killing features are discussed below under Differences: ET vs government killings.

    A common mutilation pattern in cattle and sheep: jaw strip (muscle and tissue are removed down to the bone usually on one side of the jaw), removal of one or both eyes and ears, excision of the tongue deep at its root, removal of internal and external genitalia, and removal of digestive and other soft internal organs. Injuries across mutilation victims more generally include: decapitation, bifurcation (cutting into two parts) of the torso and removal of all internal organs, brains removed through small portals bored through the skull, and — in the case of seals and dolphins — deep corkscrew lacerations running along the entire length of their bodies. To some extent, soft tissue removed from victims can be characterized as being associated with the digestive, reproductive, endocrine, cardiovascular, lymphatic and respiratory systems. Finally, mutilation victims are left with little or no blood in them and there is no blood anywhere in the vicinity of the body.7

    Sudden impact injuries

    These injuries are due to victims being dropped from height after the mutilation killing or in some cases, without mutilation (as if the victim was not considered suitable for harvesting). Therefore in many cases victims are found with broken limbs, ribs, and other bones. This is associated with markedly depressed ground beneath a carcass and sometimes broken branches of trees through which the victim fell. Occasionally the carcasses of large wild animals are found in trees or entangled in high-voltage power lines.7

    4. The method

    Marked in advance

    These premeditated and highly efficient attacks involve marking victims in advance. Many cattle were found to have been marked with fluorescent paint on their backs and sides in advance of the mutilation killings. This would enable the killers to shine a UV light on herds at night in order to attack marked animals.9,10,11,12

    Similarly, Richard D. Hall13 refers to a case in Wales involving a man and a woman parked in a car in a remote location at night. After seeing a light in the sky (a silent helicopter?) the car was covered in a white powder. The light disappeared and they promptly drove away. The history of such incidents suggests that if they had not been observant and left when they did, soon thereafter an ET-type craft would have arrived to mutilate / murder them.

    There is also evidence to suggest that in some cases electronic devices are used to mark intended victims.14

    Surgical features

    Laser-like. Flesh looks as if it could have been cut with a laser but injuries do not show carbon residue as would occur if the tissue was exposed to the heat of a normal laser.7

    Small holes. Internal organs are removed through portal incisions which are uniformly smooth and bloodless, with serrated edges. Similarly, brains are sometimes removed through a small hole bored through the upper skull. For example, in one incident a farmer discovered four cows with holes drilled into their skulls and the brains removed.7

    Scientific explanation

    From Andrew Johnson (2019):9

    1. ETs informed Wilbert Smith (1910-1962, M.Sc. Electrical Engineering, ET researcher and contactee) about “binding forces,” a force to which materials are subject.
    2. Although current physics does not acknowledge this type of force, under instruction from ETs Smith built a “binding meter” and successfully measured the binding forces of various materials.
    3. Smith learned from ETs that binding forces can be altered.
    4. Known examples of binding force alteration include the disintegration of Thomas Mantell’s plane (USA, 7 January 1948) when it entered the operational field of an ET spacecraft (this case is described in the appendix of ET spacecraft encounters, “dustificationof the World Trade Center by means of directed energy weapons on 9/11 (see the scientific analysis of Dr. Judy Wood in her book Where Did The Towers Go?) and findings of researcher John Hutchison.
    5. In Wilbert Smith’s Ottawa Address (31 March 1958)15 referred to by Andrew Johnson,9 it is further explained that by manipulating the three basic fields, not only can binding forces of an object be reduced, but temperature can be increased, potentially to very high levels.

    Also, perhaps by means of the above-mentioned ET technology, there are many cases (some of them featured in ET spacecraft encounters) of ET craft or ETs using a torch-like device to paralyse or immobilize people at a distance. An ET or human using such technology could control their victims as required for capture and harvesting.

    In summary, this ET technology can potentially explain the methods by which victims are attacked: (a) capture / control with the immobilization tool, (b) surgery involving high heat but anomalies that are inconsistent with the effects of known human technology and (c) removing organs in a stream of material by suction via small holes after reducing the binding forces of targeted organs. Perhaps the removed organs regain their original shape thereafter when bindings forces are increased.

    Other features

    Lack of blood, footprints or tracks at the scene, delayed decomposition, predator and scavenger avoidance of the carcass, and domesticated animals visibly agitated and fearful of mutilated carcasses.7,9,16,17

    Also, no law enforcement agency has identified anyone responsible for carrying out any of these many thousands of mutilation killings.

    5. The killers

    Expert analysis of ET-type mutilation killings consistently rules out natural predators or humans using known technology — but not ETs, humans using ET technology or humans working with ETs. Prior to humans acquiring (as of the 1947 Roswell spacecraft crashes) and being in a position to use ET technology for ET-type mutilation killings, all ET-type mutilation killings would have been by ETs. Further, evidence suggests that ETs (including reptilians) have continued to do some of the animal and human mutilation killings, independently of humans (no collaboration with humans).

    Some authors (e.g. the literature review of Andrew Johnson, 20199 ) suggest that most of the mutilation killings since the 1960s are done by humans (military personnel serving the Cabal) using ET technology.

    Another view expressed on UFO websites is that a substantial amount of mutilation killings are perpetrated by Grey ETs in collaboration with humans. For example, in an online discussion of why our government and ETs mutilate cattle (2014), a reader comments, “Evil Greys and Cabal are together in this.”3

    Evidence presented in ET spacecraft encounters (in the US there were Grey ETs living in underground bases and collaborating with humans, humans operating ET-type craft, and some mutilation killings by ETs who are not collaborating with humans) is consistent with all three views, i.e. some mutilation killings are done by ETs acting independently but most of these crimes are done by humans using ET technology or perhaps humans and Grey ETs working together, including Grey ETs flying some of the ET-type craft used in the mutilation killings.

    Following is additional evidence concerning the ET vs human vs ET+human views.

    Proof of ET technology and ETs

    UFOs are consistently seen operating in the places where mutilations occur.7,10,18,19 and farmers near Shrewsbury witnessed sheep being “lasered” by unidentified light from UFOs.18 In many mutilation cases ET-type aircraft were actually seen taking animals.10

    Further, ETs themselves have been seen in relation to the mutilations. In France (1954) two small humanoid figures were seen walking toward their landed aircraft and thereafter three cows in nearby farms were found dead, with all their blood removed (this case is discussed in ET spacecraft encounters) and in Vancouver, Canada (1990) a resident saw a “little man” running in a field carrying a strange device similar to a torch.19

    Physical evidence of ET-type craft at mutilation sites is similar / identical to that found at sites of known UFO landings and includes circular depressions in the ground, sometimes smaller triangular depressions suggesting landing gear, burn marks on the ground, large discoloured circular rings in the soil which defy normal vegetation growth for long periods of time7 and high radiation readings around a carcass.10,20

    Proof of human involvement

    Human drugs in cattle

    Ted Oliphant, police officer in Fyffe, Alabama, investigated over 35 cases of cattle mutilations. Between 1993 and 1997 he found non-veterinary drugs (Barbiturates, Anti-coagulants, Synthetic Amphetamines, Aluminum-Titanium-Oxygen-Silicon flakes, and Antimony) in bovine blood. These are pharmaceuticals used for humans. Consequently law enforcement agents who had thoroughly investigated cattle mutilation killings concluded that some kind of medical testing was going on.17

    Unmarked helicopters

    Since the 1960s unmarked helicopters (sometimes referred to as black helicopters and military helicopters) are consistently seen operating in the places where mutilations occur. The helicopters are often seen at mutilation locations both immediately before and after mutilations.1,7,10,12,17,20

    Observers often note that the helicopters are surprisingly quiet.21 This is consistent with the virtual silence of the Eurocopter Blue Edge rotor blade system.12

    The military operate the helicopters

    In 1976 a sheriff noticed that sightings of the black helicopters preceded mutilation killings of cattle by a day or two and that the helicopters were landing at the small Cache-Logan Community Airport. Late one evening, after seeing three unmarked and unusually quiet helicopters in the sky, the Sheriff’s deputy and several others rushed to the Cache-Logan airport. They saw a small airplane on the runway alongside one of the three helicopters. A man wearing coveralls left a helicopter with a shiny suitcase and gave it to the airplane’s pilot. The helicopter’s door was left open and allowed the sheriff to see “Property of U.S. Army” inscribed on the door of the helicopter. The Sheriff warned the man who had carried the suitcase that police and ranchers in the area suspected the helicopters of involvement in the cattle deaths and would shoot the helicopters down in future. After this confrontation, the unmarked helicopters were not seen again in northern Utah and southern Idaho and cattle mutilations there ceased for about five years.10

    Similarly, later in 1976, a National Sheriff’s Association colleague in Texas reported that cattle mutilations in that area ceased soon after organized armed patrols began closely monitoring the unmarked helicopters.10

    In 1993, on a tip-off, police officer Ted Oliphant went to a certain place in the evening and saw these helicopters where they landed to refuel (from two Chinook helicopters) in a field behind some trees. After refuelling, the helicopters were tracked to their home base, Fort Campbell, Kentucky. This event occurred in association with cattle mutilations in Sand Mountain, North East Alabama. On the basis of this evidence, Ted Oliphant suggested that many cases of cattle mutilation are actually our tax dollars at work.17

    In the UK [date not given] after intelligence and military departments held secret meetings, resulting in a decision to have fighter jets on standby to pursue the unmarked black helicopters and force them to land, almost immediately sightings of the helicopters ceased for some time.12 The helicopters are unlikely to have stopped flying after this meeting if it was not the military themselves who were operating the helicopters.

    The above-mentioned four incidents show that the unmarked helicopters are (a) operated by the military and (b) part of an enormous mutilation killing operation. In other words, the government has been harvesting body parts from animals and likely also humans.

    The military operate the ET-type craft

    Police officer Gabriel Valdez, who served in the New Mexico State Police, pursued the criminals behind animal mutilations so hard that they eventually ceased their criminal activity in areas where Valdez was active. As a result of Valdez’ efforts, on 20 April 1979 at the Albuquerque Public Library at Albuquerque, New Mexico, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) held a conference (chaired by Senator Harrison Schmitt and attended by about 180 people) about the cattle mutilation problem. Thereafter official correspondence records that there were no further reports of cattle mutilations in Indian country since March 1979.11, 22, 23

    It has also been noticed24 that ET-type mutilation killings seem to respect county (police jurisdiction) lines, i.e. there are human perpetrators involved. As with the helicopter operators, the ET-type craft operators show awareness that indicates human criminals are involved in operating the ET-type craft.

    Other proof of human perpetrators

    One night Gabriel Valdez and others approached an ET-type craft that was hovering in a pasture. The craft’s lights went out and it then flew low over their heads. It sounded like a small lawnmower motor, not the sound (e.g. whirring, buzzing) normally associated with an ET craft.9

    In one cattle mutilation incident, a gas mask was found next to a dead animal.9

    As ET-type craft are involved in mutilation killings, and government awareness of police and general public opposition to the killings resulted in a cessation of the killings, the implication is that the government / military is operating both the unmarked helicopters and many of the ET-type craft involved in the killings.

    ETs or humans on government ET-type mutilation craft?

    The discovery of a gas mask at a killing site and the man-made-sounding ET-type craft suggests that at least some of the government mutilation killings are conducted by its human employees. Considering the training of human pilots on flying disc simulators, secret human test flights of ET craft, back-engineering of ET craft, and the numerous sightings of the military’s man-made ET-type craft (see ET spacecraft encounters for details), it seems likely that (a) most if not all of the government mutilation killings since the 1980s were done by its human employees using ET technology, with (b) Grey ETs providing scientific and technological support at facilities such as those mentioned in the previous post.

    As a firm date reference, an ET-type craft seen in Rendlesham Forest (UK) on 26 and 27 December 1980 is judged9,25 to have been man-made. The craft was triangular (about 9 x 9 x 9 feet) and pyramid-like in shape. Presumably it would have been too small to contain a large animal (e.g. cow) for mutilation but perhaps it could have dealt with small animals.

    In summary, it seems likely that most if not all government mutilation killings since the 1980s were done by humans but there could have been a period as of the late 1960s (when mutilation killings started to surge) until the 1980s, when the government used Grey ETs to do the mutilation killings, i.e. the government could have used Grey ETs to do mutilation killings on its behalf for a period of over ten years.

    6. Why do ETs kill?

    According to Philip J. Corso (1915 – 1998),26 Lieutenant Colonel in the United States Army, the US Government was aware of ET-type cattle mutilations since the mid-1950s, especially in the area around Colorado. At that time it was thought that the ETs might be harvesting organs for scientific purposes (e.g. transplant into another species, or creation of a hybrid biological entity) or food (e.g. processing into a nutrient package).26

    Science and to a lesser extent food are still named as reasons for the ET mutilation killings. For example, non-specific references are made to humans and some animals being part of an ongoing biogenetic experiment.10,27 In more general terms, as I suggested in ET spacecraft encounters, it seems reasonable to think of ETs’ activities on Earth, including mutilation killings, as exploitation and management of Earth’s resources for reasons that we can only speculate about at present. In contrast, there is plenty evidence to help explain why the government mutilates and kills.

    7. Why does the government kill?

    7.1 Research

    As was noted above, Ted Oliphant found pharmaceutical evidence that indicated cattle were being used for medical testing. He elaborated by linking his findings to the nature of the mutilations:

    • Every organ taken from affected livestock has to do with input, output and reproduction.
    • Where entire jaws have been excised in large, oval excisions, the bone is exposed and is perfectly clean.
    • The wounds have been cauterized and there is no presence of blood.
    • The jaw is an important part because enzymes are produced there. Enzymes that can kill viruses and bacteria. It’s an antibody factory.
    • The digestive track also acts as a filter. It absorbs, collects and stores traces of any chemical or toxin introduced.
    • The rectum is a similar filter as are ears. They store traces of toxins and chemicals like a library.
    • As many diseases (like CJD and BSE ) can be inherited, the reproductive system may be a good place to look for clues on how it is passed to the next generation.17

    Similarly, Richard D. Hall (2016)1 suggests that soft tissue and blood is removed in order to sample environmental effects and Andrew Johnson (2019)9 notes that (a) the common removal of lymph nodes from cattle is consistent with research on the effects of anthrax or similar being introduced into the cattle or the environment and (b) liver samples from a mutilated cow showed a very high level of potassium (potassium iodine is used to block radioactive iodine from entering the thyroid).

    In other words, as Andrew Johnson points out, (a) in part, the military seems to have been using other peoples’ animals (and perhaps humans) to research weapons, including biological weapons and (b) the human perpetrators of animal and human mutilation killings consider themselves above the law and beyond the realm of normal ability to investigate serious crimes.

    7.2 Animals used to grow antibodies

    Richard D. Hall1,14 supports this explanation of Dr. Philip Duke, who has investigated many mutilation killings:

    • The animals are used to incubate certain antibodies for which the perpetrators have a future use.
    • The killer targets an animal to be used as an incubator and then injects it with an agent (e.g. a virus) that causes the victim to grow antibodies against the agent.
    • A certain period of time (weeks or months) is allowed to pass in order for the antibodies to become resident throughout the victim’s blood and internal organs.
    • The killer then returns to harvest the antibodies in a mutilation killing.
    • Dr. Duke believes that in at least some cases HIV is injected into the victim for the purpose of growing HIV antibodies.

    Richard D. Hall gives an example1 of how horses have been used in this way to grow antibodies for injection into humans to prevent their bodies from rejecting transplanted organs. Rejection is a major cause of transplant failure and antibody specific to select immune components is occasionally used to treat severe acute rejection.28 In such cases the organ recipient is infused with anti-lymphocyte globulin (ALG) animal- antibodies against human T cells.29

    More recently the organ recipient can undergo genetic modification to deactivate genes that would otherwise cause the body to reject transplants.28 Further, genetic engineering is now used to create transgenic animal systems that express human antibodies. Mice, rats, rabbits, chickens and cows have been modified to express human antibodies and therapeutic molecules derived from antibodies have become a dominant class of drugs.30

    Considering the well-established facts of the Cabal’s criminality and control of governments (e.g. see academic publications on the Occidental Observer, site of Prof. Kevin MacDonald), including the military (and their operation of ET-type craft for mutilation killings), it is necessary to consider the possibility that some of the Cabal’s human mutilation killings have been for the purposes of regenerative medicine and organ transplantation.


    I need young blood.

    7.3 Regenerative medicine and young blood

    Regenerative medicine aims to replace, engineer or regenerate human or animal cells, tissues or organs to restore or establish normal function.31 In particular, wealthy old people use the blood of young people for rejuvenation. People have long been aware of the potential for rejuvenating old people with the blood of young people. In 1492 three young boys were used to provide a blood transfusion for Pope Innocent VIII32 and the novel Dracula (1897) by Bram Stoker features a vampire named Dracula who drinks his victims’ blood to restore his youth.33 The origin of Count Dracula is in George du Maurier’s 1895 novel Trilby, wherein the villain of Trilby, Svengali, is an Ashkenazi jew. Bram Stoker was aware of jew evil and intensely anti-jew.34

    There is evidence from animal studies to suggest that infusion of young blood into older people can temporarily reverse ageing in the older people, e.g. reverse age-related cognitive decline and revitalize cartilage, muscle (including heart) and liver.32,35 Blood plasma contains proteins, enzymes and other antibodies to control disease and ageing and a growing number of clinics offer plasma from young donors to older people who can afford the fees.32 Several companies offer young blood transfusions from 18-25 year old donors and charge from $8,000.00 to $150,000.00 for the treatment.35

    Regardless of the ethics (e.g. exploiting poor donors) the market for young blood has expanded36 and a growing number of start-up companies are intent on capturing some of the money available in this industry.37 As a reader commented under the article Can Blood from Young People Slow Ageing?37 in relation to the apparently unlimited supply of young blood, “Shouldn’t law enforcement be looking into this?”

    Jews and the illegal trade in body parts is discussed in the post Jews and the illegal trade in body parts.

    8. Differences: ET vs government killings

    My impression after studying many mutilation killing reports (articles, videos, photographs) is that the mutilations done by ETs are different to those done by the government. There are possibly also differences between the mutilations done by different ET groups (most likely sub-species of Greys and Reptilians), depending on their objectives. However these seem to be distinguishing characteristics of government mutilation killings:

    Removal of more organs from young victims

    If a human victim is young (adolescence or early adulthood) it seems that more of the organs are missing, including all the skin. The total removal of young humans’ skin seems to have occurred in the Dalby Forest (UK, 1980s or early 1990s) cases reported by Tony Dodd5 and it occurred in the Brecon Beacons case (UK, 20 Aug 1990) reported by Richard D. Hall.13 On this point, skin grafts are done for a variety of reasons (e.g. infection, burns, ulcers, breast reconstruction) and the skin of unrelated people (allograft) can be grafted onto patients.38 It is notable that since the Cabal started doing ET-type mutilation killings, at least one young female victim was found with her breasts cut off and missing.13

    This is in contrast to the first documented incident of human mutilation killing that (a) involved autopsy and (b) unequivocally met the criteria for ET-type mutilation killing. In that case nine young Russian hikers were killed on 1 and 2 February 1959 (before the government started mutilation killing). Two of the bodies were missing eyes, one was missing the tongue and one was missing the eyebrows. There was no extensive skin removal and no blood removal reported. See the appendix for more information on this case.

    Blood removal

    In contrast to the above-mentioned Russian case of no human blood removal and the early documented cases (e.g. the above-mentioned unexplained livestock deaths in 1606) that do not mention blood removal, blood removal is a typical feature of animal and human mutilations since the government started doing these crimes.

    Respect for the bodies of dead humans

    As in many ET-type mutilation killings, the bodies of the above-mentioned young Russians showed sudden impact injuries, i.e. the ETs simply dumped the bodies from a height when they had finished with them, as they would do with animals. Although evidence indicates that the government also dumps animals from a height after harvesting, I am not aware of any evidence to suggest that the government has dumped human bodies from a height. On the contrary, human remains (e.g. the bodies of a young man and woman in the Brecon Beacons case discussed by Richard D. Hall13) seemed to have been placed carefully on the ground. This distinction between the treatment of animals vs humans is consistent with human killers showing at least some respect for their own kind, especially as the killers in the ET-type craft were likely not jews.

    Murder disguised as mutilation killing?

    The ET-type mutilation killing of a 36 year-old professor of Agroecology in Brazil on 27 June 2019 has features that suggest the primary motive could have been murder. Apparently neighbours saw two men leaving the professor’s home and driving off in his car around the time he went missing. The professor was known to be an assertive person and his work in ecology could have brought him into conflict with the interests of big money. The ET-style mutilation killing could have been a way of humans murdering him while feeling safe in the knowledge that no-one has ever been found guilty of an ET-type mutilation killing, animal or human. For those with access to the required technology, ET-type mutilation killing could be a preferred assassination method in some cases. See the appendix for more information on this case.

    9. Lunar factors in the killings

    For the reasons given in ET spacecraft encounters, an association could be expected between the dates of genuine ET mutilation killings and lunar factors. However as it seems unlikely that the timing of government mutilation killings (the majority of the killings) would be influenced by considerations of energy availability in the natural environment (government ET-type craft could meet their energy requirements from their bases on Earth) we might see an association between the dates of government mutilation killings and lunar factors due to lunar influences on the physiology of victims.

    Lunar cycles are among the more important natural factors that regulate health and reproduction of vertebrates39 although light pollution is a global problem affecting both terrestrial and marine environments. Increased light pollution can help explain why early studies found circalunar rhythms in vertebrates while some of the more recent studies did not find such a relationship.40 Nonetheless, there is evidence of lunar influences on the physiology of humans and other mammals, including other primates, badgers40 and cattle. Spontaneous birth frequency of cows increased uniformly from new moon to full moon phase and decreased until the waning crescent phase.41

    Human scientists involved in planning the mutilation killings would know about the lunar influence on physiology. To control for possible confounding factors (e.g. differences between breeds and species, and lunar influences) in their research, we could expect to see indications of the scientists holding such variables constant. As was noted above under The victims, certain types of animals (particularly breeds of cattle and horses; species of seal) are targeted. This is consistent with what would be expected in scientific research. Similarly, we could expect to see some consistency of mutilation killings in relation to the moon. Apart from experimental control of unwanted influences, we might also see consistency on some factors for reasons of the desired product, e.g. quality, quantity and uniformity (of blood components and state of other body parts that vary across animals, humans and with lunar factors).

    On the basis of the above, I analysed the dates of the 81 ET-type mutilation killings in relation to phases of the Moon and the Moon’s perigee – apogee cycle using the method stated in ET spacecraft encounters.

    9.1 Findings

    ET-type mutilation killings: Lunar cycle and phase

    Figure 1a. No. of mutilation killings per day across lunar cycle.
    Figure 1b. No. of mutilation killings per lunar phase.

    Fewest mutilation killings occurred during First Quarter and most mutilation killings occurred during Last Quarter. The Chi^2 value for the difference between these two phases is 0.641. The p-value is .42334, i.e. the result is not significant at p < .05. This finding indicates that ET-type mutilation killings were not more likely to occur during Last Quarter than First Quarter.

    Summary: ET-type mutilation killings by lunar phase

    The ET-type mutilation killings were not significantly more likely to occur during any particular lunar phase.

    ET- type mutilation killings: Perigee-apogee cycle and lunar phase

    Figure 2a. No. of mutilation killings per day across perigee-apogee cycle.
    Figure 2b. No. of mutilation killings by lunar phase and closest point (perigee or apogee) in perigee-apogee cycle.

    In Figure 2a light blue shading demarcates the cases that occurred closer to perigee from those that occurred closer to apogee. Notable feature of this chart: More cases occurred closer to perigee than closer to apogee. The Chi^2 value for the difference between these two groups is 7.716. The p-value is .00547. The difference is significant at p < .01.

    In Figure 2b yellow shading highlights the biggest differences between certain lunar phase and perigee-apogee categories. The Chi^2 and p-values for the differences between these groups:

    First Quarter with the Moon closer to Perigee vs First Quarter with the Moon closer to Apogee (Chi^2 value 2.882, p-value .08956). Although this difference is not significant at p < .05, it approaches significance at that level.

    First Quarter with the Moon closer to Apogee vs Full Moon with the Moon closer to Perigee (Chi^2 value 4.263, p-value .03895). This difference is significant at p < .05.

    Full Moon with the Moon closer to Perigee vs Full Moon with the Moon closer to Apogee (Chi^2 value 2.333, p-value .12663). Although this difference is notable, it is not significant at p < .05.

    Full Moon with the Moon closer to Apogee vs Last Quarter with the Moon closer to Perigee (Chi^2 value 1.8, p-value .17971). This difference is not significant at p < .05.

    New Moon with the Moon closer to Perigee vs New Moon with the Moon closer to Apogee (Chi^2 value 2.333, p-value .12663). Although this difference is notable, it is not significant at p < .05.

    Summary: Perigee-apogee and lunar phase findings

    The ET-type mutilation killings were significantly more likely to occur when the Moon was closer to Earth (closer to Perigee). Across all lunar phases most mutilation killings occurred when the moon was closer to Earth, with this difference approaching or reaching statistical significance in some comparisons.

    The above finding is opposite to that of ET spacecraft sightings (presented in ET spacecraft encounters) as is shown in Figure 3.

    ET craft sightings vs ET- type mutilation killings: Perigee-apogee cycle and lunar phase

    Figure 3. ET craft sightings vs ET-type mutilation killings: No. of cases by lunar phase and closest point (perigee or apogee) in perigee-apogee cycle.

    There was a tendency for the ET craft to be seen when the Moon was further from Earth (closer to Apogee), particularly during Last Quarter and New Moon. However, ET-type mutilation killings were more likely to occur when the Moon was closer to Earth (closer to Perigee).

    Interpretation of the lunar findings

    The lunar findings support this view:

    • ET craft operators have different considerations (e.g. energy, as was noted in ET spacecraft encounters) to those (e.g. scientific and harvested product considerations) of ET-type mutilation killing craft operators.
    • Most ET-type mutilation killings were perpetrated by humans operating from bases on Earth. If this was not the case, the dates of ET craft sightings (analysed in ET spacecraft encounters) and ET-type mutilation killings would likely show a similar pattern in relation to the lunar factors. However the pattern is opposite — ET craft were more likely to be seen when the Moon was further from Earth and mutilation killings were more likely to occur when the Moon was closer to Earth.
    • The lunar findings are consistent with human researchers holding perigee – apogee effects on targets’ physiology constant by killing / harvesting near perigee.
    • The lunar findings are also consistent with humans killing / harvesting when the body parts are most suitable — assuming that the blood and other body parts are in a more suitable state at perigee rather than apogee.

    10. Summary of main points

    1. ET-type mutilation killings of animals and humans have surged since the late 1960′s.
    2. ET-type mutilation killings are a global problem that includes the murder of young people for their body parts.
    3. The incidence of missing young people suggests that the incidence of ET-type murder of young people for their body parts could be high.
    4. Repeated and reliable observation of humans involved in perpetrating ET-type mutilation killings and other evidence of human responsibility for these crimes indicates that since the late 1960s, most ET-type mutilation killings have been done by the government, i.e. the Cabal in control of our societal levers.
    5. There seem to be significant differences between ET and Cabal mutilation killings on body parts targeted, the amount of body parts harvested, and treatment of human remains.
    6. There is speculation about why ETs harvest animal and human body parts, including the possibilities of science (e.g. creating a hybrid biological entity) and food (nutrition for the ETs).
    7. The Cabal mutilation killings are consistent with their publicly-declared transhumanist (“Great Reset,” New World Order, brutal world government by jews) ambitions, including mutilation killings for research, antibodies, and (in cases of human mutilation killings) regenerative medicine and young blood, and organ transplantation.
    8. In addition to the proof of Cabal perpetration of most mutilation killings since the 1960s, it is notable that the Cabal’s ET-type mutilation killings are similar to their ritual mutilation killings of Christians and some of their other murders, e.g. extreme torture; draining of blood; puncture wounds; excision of body parts including breasts, genitals, tongue, heart; mutilating eyes; cutting muscles; beheading and dismembering(Jews’ ritual mutilation murder of non-Jews).
    9. In some ways the remains of Cabal mutilation killing victims since the 1960s look as if instead of knives and traditional jewish butchering skills, the killers had ET technology and new objectives, e.g. sinister science and profit in the regenerative medicine and organ transplantation markets.
    10. Known ET technology can help explain the methods by which victims are captured / controlled and operated on, including the removal of organs through small holes.
    11. The analysis of ET-type mutilation killings in relation to lunar factors, and the comparison of these findings to those of ET craft sightings, adds weight to the conclusion that the Cabal has done most of the ET-type mutilation killings of animals and humans since the 1960s.

    11. References

    1. Hall, Richard D. (2016). The UK animal mutilation cover up, Part 3 of 3, RichPlanet TV.
    2. Hurley, Matt (2021). Animal mutilation mystery.
    3. Haven, Lisa (2014). Secret files exposed: Why UFO and Government mutilate cattle, Before It’s News, 5 April 2014.
    4. Cattle mutilation & related reports & data (2009). Alien Hub, 22 Nov 2009.
    5. Hall, Richard D. (2014). The human mutilation cover up, Part 1 of 3, RichPlanet TV.
    6. The truth about child abduction statistics in 2022 (2022), Safe at Last, 15 March 2022.
    7. Vander Ploeg, Dirk (2014). More significant observations relating to animal mutilations — Part II, UFO Digest, 22 March 2014.
    8. RichPlanet TV search results for: mutilations.
    9. Johnson, Andrew (2019). Acknowledged: A perspective on UFOs, Aliens and Crop Circles.
    10. Animal Mutilations, Crystalinks.
    11. Cattle5.pdf, UFO Casebook.
    12. Lowth, Marcus (2018). What are the Black Helicopter conspiracies? UFO Insight, 21 Nov 2018.
    13. Hall, Richard D. (2011). Derek Gough 2011 interview, Part 1 of 1, RichPlanet TV.
    14. Hall, Richard D. (2010). Silent killers in Sussex, Part 3 of 4, RichPlanet TV.
    15. Smith, Wilbert (31 March 1958). The Ottawa Address.
    16. Strickler, Lon (2011). Animal mutilations in Wales, Phantoms and Monsters, 31 Aug 2011.
    17. Cattle mutilation reports, MUFON.
    18. Andrews, Colin (2010). Unexplained sheep attacks ’caused by aliens in UFOs‘, 5 Apr 2010.
    19. Lowth, Marcus (2017). Human cattle mutilation: The grim and chilling claims, UFO Insight, 1 Mar 2017.
    20. Bonham, Nick (2013). Cattle mutilations: Aliens? The Pueblo Chieftain, 14 Jul 2013.
    21. Animal mutilations: A worldwide phenomena, NOUFORS.
    22. Cattle3.pdf, UFO Casebook.
    23. Cattle4.pdf, UFO Casebook.
    24. Sputnik (2000). Cattle mutilation, Everything2, 8 Aug 2000.
    25. Hall, Richard D. (2010). Animal mutilation mystery, Part 2 of 3, RichPlanet TV.
    26. Corso, Philip J. (1997). The day after Roswell.
    27. Reddit (2022).Why do aliens mutilate cattle?
    28. Wikipedia: Transplant rejection
    29. Wikipedia: Anti-lymphocyte globulin
    30. Chen, W.C. and Murawsky, C.M. (2018). Strategies for generating diverse antibody repertoires using transgenic animals expressing human antibodies, Front. Immunol., 07 March 2018.
    31. Wikipedia: Regenerative medicine
    32. “New Blood” – Young plasma replacement for longevity and anti-aging, Asher Longevity Institute.
    33. Wikipedia: Dracula: Major themes
    34. Pennington, Rosemary W. (2020). The jewish origin of Bram Stoker’s Count Dracula, National Vanguard, 1 August, 2020.
    35. Young Blood Antiaging
    36. Knoepfler, Prof. Paul, Ph.D (2017). Young blood as anti-aging fountain of youth: hype or hope? The Niche, 20 August 2017.
    37. Piore, Adam (2021). Can blood from young people slow aging? Newsweek, 7 Apr 2021.
    38. Scott, Julie (2022). Skin graft: Everything you need to know, Verywell Health, 15 Aug 2022.
    39. Norris, D.O. & Carr, J. A. (2021). Environmental endocrinology of vertebrates, in Vertebrate Endocrinology (Sixth Ed.), Ch. 15, pp 527-568.
    40. Raible, F., Takekata, H. & Tessmar-Raible, K. (2017). An overview of monthly rhythms and clocks, Front. Neurol., 12 May 2017.
    41. Yonezawa, T., Uchida, M., Tomioka,M. & Matsuki, N. (2016). Lunar cycle influences spontaneous delivery in cows, PLOS, 31 August 2016.

    12. Appendix

    List of 81 ET-type mutilation killing reports
    [A 107 kB text file of 40 pages for download]

  • ET spacecraft encounters

    ET spacecraft encounters

    A photograph of one of two ET spacecraft that crashed in Roswell (New Mexico) in 1947, published on 8 July 1947 in the Roswell Daily Record. The craft seem to have been either shot down or brought down using high-powered RADAR to interfere with their guidance or propulsion systems. Many witnesses spoke of this incident and it was reported in the local newspaper. ET humanoid bodies (living and dead) and debris were flown to Wright Field, Ohio. One of the ETs survived until 1954.1

    Post outline

    1. Twenty-five examples of ET craft encounters
    2. Lunar factors in ET craft sightings
    3. Technical aspects of ET craft operation
    4. The 145 ET craft encounters: Notable features
    5. Why are ET craft here?
    6. Where do the ET craft come from?
    7. Summary of main points
    8. References
    9. Appendix

    It took many years for humans to develop anti-gravity craft based on ET technology acquired as of the 1947 Roswell ET spacecraft crashes. Flying disc simulators for training human pilots to fly ET-type craft started operating in the early 1960s and test flights of ET-type craft started in the 1980s. As a firm date reference, it seems that the first recorded sighting of a man-made ET-type craft might have been the craft seen in Rendlesham Forest (UK) on 26 and 27 December 1980.1,2

    Therefore it seems safe to assume that any ET-type craft seen before 1980 were of ET origin and controlled by ETs. With careful evaluation of subsequent ET-type craft sightings it should be possible to exclude most / all man-made anti-gravity craft sightings and continue focusing on genuine ET craft sightings as I have tried to do.

    1. Twenty-five examples of ET craft encounters

    Following are the main points of 25 incidents from the above-mentioned list of 145 such events. A link to the full list (includes links to source material and photographs / video) is in the Appendix. The 25 example cases are presented below in date order.

    1. USA, 25 February 1942
    In the early morning of 25 February 1942, suddenly out of nowhere, a huge object of unknown origin levelled off at a lower altitude. The object continued on a trajectory east toward the city of Los Angeles at ultra high speed, barely skimming the water. The object reduced it’s speed to a near crawl some 50 miles out, turning inland near Point Dume. The air raid warning system regional controller ordered the anti-aircraft batteries to go to Green Alert — “ready to fire.” At 2:15 am the controller ordered the whole warning system into operation. At 3:06 am, at least four Santa Monica area anti-aircraft batteries turned inland and started firing over the city and Baldwin Hills. Suddenly “the air over Los Angeles erupted like a volcano.” For the next three hours it was nothing but confusion with swarms of planes of all possible sizes reported, numbering from one to several hundred, travelling at altitudes from a few thousand feet to more than 20,000, and flying at speeds from very slow to hundreds of miles per hour.

    However, despite the fact that 1,440 rounds of anti-aircraft ammunition had been expended, the UFO seemed impervious to the barrage and it eventually left with no sign of damage.

    2. Indonesia, 10 August 1944
    Shortly after midnight on 10 August 1944, Captain Alvah M. Reida of the 486th Bomb Group, 792nd Squadron, was flying a B-29 Bomber from Ceylon to Palembang. The right gunner and copilot reported a bright red or orange spherical object pacing the plane about 500 yards off the starboard wing. It was about 5 or 6 feet in diameter and seemed to vibrate constantly. Captain Reida attempted evasive action, but the object followed every manoeuvrer for about eight minutes, then suddenly made an abrupt 90 degree turn and accelerated away rapidly.

    Note: This type of UFO was often seen by Allied aircraft pilots during World War II. It was referred to as a Foo Fighter. Military censorship kept reports of these phenomena out of the newspapers until December 1944.

    3. India, 15 March 1951
    At 10:20 am in New Delhi, members of a flying club, including the chief aerial engineer George F. Floate, witnessed a swirly white cloud appear in the sky from north to south at about 4,000 feet. The cloud was about 700 feet long and increasing in length. At the end of it a metallic cigar-shaped object about 100 feet long (about the size of a C-47 fuselage) appeared. The object was seen by 25 flying club members.

    It headed south for about three minutes and then made a loop, coming back over the airfield. At the top of the loop it was out of sight but came back into sight during the dive. The object left a white exhaust which turned black when it accelerated to about 1,000 mph during the loop. After recovering straight and level flight, the object proceeded to the south-west until out of sight. It was observed for a total time of about seven minutes.

    4. UK, 21 October 1952
    In the afternoon of 21 October 1952, RAF pilots Flt Lt Michael Swiney and Lt David Crofts, in a Gloster Meteor, saw three white disc-shaped objects at 35,000 feet near RAF Little Rissington, a base in eastern Gloucestershire. The pilots noted that the shape of the saucer shape was perfectly circular. Flt Lt Swiney reported the sighting of the three saucer objects to his Ground Control at RAF Sopley and abruptly cancelled the training flight. Lt Crofts asked whether to pursue the three objects, but Flt Lt Swiney declined. The three objects crossed over the Meteor’s path, from left to right and remained on that side. In a fraction of a second, the objects disappeared.

    ATCC Gloucester (RAF Staverton, now Gloucestershire Airport) confirmed the three objects that the pilots had seen. Two Meteor F.8 aircraft of RAF Fighter Command were scrambled to intercept the objects but the fighter aircraft did not make contact with the objects. The RAF Southern Sector, based in Wiltshire, had detected three objects entering their airspace at 3,000 mph.

    5. Papua New Guinea, 23 August 1953
    At about 11:00 am on 23 August 1953, Port Moresby, T. P. Drury (Deputy Minister of Civil Aviation) and his wife noticed a wisp of a cloud suddenly appear in the blue sky from nowhere and rapidly build up into a thick white mass of cumulus. There were no other clouds in the sky and there seemed nothing to account for it. Drury filmed this event and what happened next.

    Suddenly, an object like a silver dart shot out of the cloud. It was elongated in shape like a bullet. It was very clear-cut, sharp in front but apparently truncated behind, though the tail may have been hidden by the vapour trail. No wings or fins were visible. It shot out of the cloud upwards at an angle of about 45 degrees and was travelling at least five times as fast as a jet plane travelling at the speed of sound. It never slackened speed or changed direction, but simply faded upwards into the blue and its vapour faded after it. The vapour trail was very clear, dense, white and billowing. In spite of the supersonic speed and nearness of the object, there was no sound whatever.

    Air Traffic Control at Jackson’s Airport could not explain the sighting in terms of known aircraft and the RAAF was also unable to account for it. Drury’s film was later sent all over the world but no-one could explain the object.

    6. France, 10 September 1954
    At about 22:30 on the night of 10 September 1954, railway worker Marius Dewilde went outside to investigate the reason for his dog’s barking. He walked to the nearby railway tracks, where he saw an object about six or seven metres away from him and two small humanoid figures. Suddenly the object emitted a light beam that paralysed him. He then saw a door open in the object, the two beings board it, and the craft rise toward the sky while changing its colours.

    When he recovered from the paralysis, Dewilde went home and told his wife and then his neighbour about what he had just witnessed. He then informed the local police and police officers visited his home. Upon approach to the incident location, Dewilde became sick and could not proceed further. Also, objects which are energized by battery, like Dewilde’s flashlight and telephone, stopped working.

    The following day, as people investigated the incident scene, an approaching train produced a very loud noise as it passed by, causing the train to stop. A six-metre depression was found on the exact spot where the object had landed and this had caused the noise. Also, the small rocks under the train tracks were all carbonized on the depression and the sleepers between the steel lines featured symmetric marks.

    Following the incident, three cows in nearby farms were found dead. Autopsies on the animals revealed that their blood had been totally removed. Several local people claimed sightings of objects and creatures similar to the ones witnessed by Dewilde. Dewilde suffered respiratory problems after the incident and his dog died three days after exposure to the ET craft.

    7. Italy, 28 October 1954
    On 27 October 1954, UFOs stopped a professional football match just after half-time in front of ten-thousand fans at Stadio Artemi Franchi, Florence. The spectators stopped watching the match and the footballers stopped playing. Everyone looked up at objects shaped like Cuban cigars moving across the sky. They were dropping what was variously described as similar to silver glitter, cotton wool or cobwebs and angel hair. The newspaper La Nazione referred to this substance as glass fibres. After a short period of time the material disintegrated, e.g. a 10 year-old boy described seeing the roofs of houses in Florence covered in this white substance for one hour in broad daylight and then the substance seemed to evaporate.

    Also, the substance disintegrated on contact and was therefore hard to collect. However Giorgio Batini, a journalist at La Nazione, and other people, managed to gather samples of the material. They took the samples to the Institute of Chemical Analysis at the University of Florence. The laboratory (led by respected scientist Prof Giovanni Canneri) subjected the material to spectrographic analysis and concluded that it contained the elements boron, silicon, calcium and magnesium, and that it was not radioactive.

    There were numerous UFO sightings in many towns across Tuscany that day and over the days that followed.

    8. UK, 17 July 1955
    On 17 July 1955 at noon, in Bexleyheath in London, a 30 foot-wide saucer-shaped object was seen hovering a few feet above a street in broad daylight by Margaret Fry and her doctor. Car engines near the object stalled. The aircraft made a humming noise. It landed at the junction of Ashbourne Road and Whitfield Road, hovered over Bedonwell Primary School (now Bedonwell Junior School) for about one minute, and finally shot off into the sky. The object was seen by about thirty people. Another UFO landed a few streets away at the same time. A similar object was seen in Bexleyheath in 1952.

    9. UK, 13 August 1956
    On a dry and largely clear night, USAF radar picked up 12 to 15 objects over East Anglia. One object was tracked at more than 4,000 mph by USAF GCA radar at RAF Bentwaters. The objects sometimes travelled in formation, then converged to form a larger object and performed sharp turns. One object was tracked for 26 miles. It hovered for five minutes then flew off. At 10 pm an object was tracked at 12,000 mph. RAF de Havilland Venoms from RAF Waterbeach had sightings of the objects and ground personnel at Lakenheath made visual sightings of several luminous objects, including two which arrived, made a sharp change in course, and appeared to merge before moving off.

    The sequence of events is recorded in the original Project Blue Book file by the USAF, subsequently analysed by the Condon Committee and by atmospheric physicist James E. McDonald. The final phase of the incident was described in some detail by Technical Sergeant Forrest Perkins, who was the Watch Supervisor in the Lakenheath Radar Air Traffic Control centre and who wrote directly to the Condon Committee in 1968.

    10. Argentina, 1 December 1965
    Staff at the Adhara Observatory photographed the moon in fixed intervals. Some photos revealed disc-shaped objects flying in front of the moon.

    11. Canada, 4 October 1967
    On the night of 4 October 1967, several people saw orange lights over the sea near the small fishing village Shag Harbour and one of the lights went into the water. Royal Canadian Mounted Police Constable Ron Pound investigated and also saw the lights. Pound saw a yellow light slowly moving on the water, leaving a yellowish foam in its wake. Fishermen on boats saw the lights and at close range they confirmed that one of the objects left a yellow foam in its wake.

    For several days thereafter, divers from HMCS Granby (a minesweeper in the Royal Canadian Navy) searched the bottom of the ocean where the incident occurred. Their findings were not released but the following is known: The object was detected with hydrophones and naval vessels were positioned over it, after entering the waters of Shag Harbour the object travelled underwater for about 25 miles to a place called Government Point (near a top-secret NATO submarine detection base), after a few days a second USO (unidentified submerged object) joined the first, the second craft assisted the original USO, and eventually the two underwater craft surfaced and flew away.

    12. Finland, 12 April 1969
    Two pilots in Pori, Finland, named Jouko Kuronen and Tarmo Tukeva reported seven plate-shaped objects in a formation that flew at “ällistyttävällä” (incredible) speeds. The objects were later detected via radar nearly 200 kilometers away in Vaasa. This sighting was acknowledged by the Finnish Air Force and published in Ruotuväki (2012), the Finnish Defense Forces’ magazine.

    13. South Africa, 26 June 1971
    Bennie Smit, owner of Braeside farm near Fort Beaufort in the eastern Cape, fired shots at an unknown object during the morning of 26 June 1971. He was alerted to it by his labourer, Boer de Klerk, who at 9:00 noticed a fireball of some 2.5 feet (0.76 m) in diameter, moving about at treetop height. Smit accurately fired eight shots at it, but these had no visible effect. The object reacted to their presence by moving away.

    Police sergeant Piet Kitching and police station commander P. R. van Rensburg arrived at 10:00 and fired additional shots. They stated that the object had been changing its colour up to this point, but now assumed the appearance of a gunmetal grey, and was somewhat like an oval-shaped 44-gallon drum. When Smit fired two final shots from a mere 10 to 18 m distance, the object lifted off, entering impenetrable woods where it could be heard crashing through the undergrowth. Smit had a final sighting after 12 noon, but subsequently heard its sound at night. Six council members at Fort Beaufort also reported watching the object though binoculars. Three sets of three imprints of its supposed landing gear were found in hard clay. The Grahamstown army regiment was said to have investigated the site.

    14. Italy, 30 November 1973
    Pilot Riccardo Marano was about to land at Caselle Airport, Turin, in a Piper Navajo, when the controller notified him that there was a UFO about 400 meters (1,320 feet) above the runway. He looked and saw a luminous, multicoloured ball of light changing from violet to blue to dark red. “When I got closer and had a better view,” he said, “the object at once made off, flying in a most irregular fashion, manoeuvring in a way I have seen no plane do, making fantastic lateral deviations, and sudden vast jumps to and fro, as if it enjoyed playing hide-and-seek. Its speed was as high as 900 km per hour (540 mph).”

    The UFO was also seen by (a) Col. Rustichelli (commandant of the Caselle military airfield) on his own radar screen (“It was something solid, lit up, like a plane on my radar”), (b) Commander Tranquillo, pilot of an Alitalia Air Line DC-9 en route from Turin to Rome (he called to the control tower: “I see a shining thing giving out intermittent flashes of light, four miles from me. I dare not approach. I give way.”) and (c) Commander Mezzalami (in another Alitalia DC-9, “I was able to observe the object — notified by the control tower just as I was about to touch down. I had a good view of it.”).

    15. Canada, 13 May 1975
    “Charlie Red Star” was a glowing red plasma-looking ball seen by hundreds of people on many occasions. A firm date given for one of these sightings is 13 May 1975. The object visited a small town called Carman, Manitoba, almost every night in 1975. Winnipeg TV station captured footage of Charlie Red Star and Grant Cameron (author of Charlies Red Star: True Reports of One of North America’s Biggest UFO Sightings) witnessed Charlie Red Star multiple times at night, including a very close encounter when the red ball flew in front of his car.

    According to Cameron, the UFO encounters may be related to ballistic missiles that were secretly installed in that area at the beginning of 1975, because after the weapons were removed in November 1975, the Charlie Red Star visits stopped.

    16. Canada, 26 October 1978
    Twelve people in Clarenville saw a UFO in the early morning. The object was oval-shaped with a fin on its tail and had blue, red and yellow flashing lights. The craft emitted no sound. The Royal Canadian Mounted Police were called and then Constable James Blackwood witnessed the UFO hover about 100 feet (30.5 m) above the water for about two hours before leaving at the speed of a shooting star. Blackwood used a telescope specialized for drug surveillance to observe the UFO and other eyewitnesses used binoculars. When Blackwood flicked on his car’s flashing blue and red lights, the object in the sky reacted by imitating the pattern of flashing lights.

    In addition to the eyewitness reports, this object was tracked by the Department of National Defense, Gander, NF.

    17. Korea, 31 March 1980
    On 31 March 1980 four Korean pilots were given orders to chase an Unidentified Flying Object. Korean Air Vice Marshal Im Byungsun spoke of closely witnessing an object flying at a trajectory that was rendered impossible by the limits of man-made technology. He stated, “The Unidentified Flying Object was disc-shaped and as big as three McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom IIs. It was strongly emitting sparks and lights from the core. The colour was similar to what one would see in oxy-fuel welding.” The sighting was further corroborated by Air Force colonel Lee Seungbae and Air force colonel Park Osang.

    18. France, 8 January 1981
    At about 5 pm on the afternoon of 8 January1981, while working on his farm in the Var region of south-eastern France, a man called Nicolai heard a faint whistling. He then saw a device in the air at the height of a big pine tree at the edge of the property. The device landed with the impact of a boulder hitting the ground (it was later determined that the ground had been compressed by a pressure of about 4 or 5 tons). Then it took off, tilted, and travelled at lightning speed toward the north-east.

    Nicolai was only about 30 metres from the landed craft and described it in detail: the shape of two saucers, one inverted on top of the other, a ridge all the way around its circumference; 1.5 metres in height; the colour of lead; and underneath were what looked like two circular trapdoors and two reactors or feet which extended about 20 cm below the body. After the object left, Nicolai went to the landing spot and noticed a circle about two metres in diameter. At certain places along the circumference of the circle were traces like abrasions.

    Physical traces left on the ground were collected by the Gendarmerie within 24 hours and later analysed in several French government laboratories. Extensive evidence of anomalous activity was detected. GEPAN (a department of the French Space Agency responsible for the investigation of UFO reports) also reconstructed the trajectory and duration.

    Scientific analysis of the circular trace revealed that it was 2.4 metres in diameter in the form of a 0.2 metre wide ring, lighter in colour than the surrounding dirt, and formed by an extremely localized force applied in a nearly circular pattern. Also, analysis of resident alfalfa near the landing site showed chlorophyll levels between 30% and 50% lower than expected.

    19. Indonesia, 27 August 1992
    A UFO passed over Ngurah Rai Airport on 27 August 1992. It was first spotted by Japanese people Masumisan and Mamisun at 7:15 pm. The UFO was then witnessed by the entire group of Japanese tourists along with Prayogo, Executive Director of Equator Divepro. The UFO was flat and seen swinging in the air with four bright yellowish lights. Two were brightly glowing above and two below. The object disappeared from view after four minutes. All the tourists’ cameras and video recorders jammed during this incident.

    20. South Africa, 30 March 1995
    This incident was documented in the 2 April 1995 edition of the Afrikaanse Sonntagszeitung Rapport newspaper. At about 8:30 am on 30 March 1995 in the Groot Marico region of Transvaal, 45 year-old farmer Jan Pienaar was driving his truck on a remote country road. The engine of his truck came to an abrupt halt. He then saw a strange disc-shaped object overhead with what he thought was a hole in its hull. He continued watching the vehicle as it landed at the roadside, eventually resting on three landing pods. The craft covered almost the entire road and seemed to be almost 10 metres high. Pienaar described the craft as translucent and lustrous, as though it was fabricated from a type of stainless steel, in the shape of two inverted soup plates with a pudding bowl on top. He also noted that the craft had several windows or portholes, its hull was lit up by a red-violet-green-yellow glow, and it emitted a strange buzzing sound.

    Pienaar exited the truck with the intention of walking toward the object. However he found himself stuck to the spot and unable to move for almost five minutes. He said that it felt as though a magnet held him to the spot.

    Suddenly the craft rose vertically into the air, slowly at first and then at the speed of lightning. Pienaar was then able to start his truck engine and drive to a nearby farm from where he reported the incident to the police. The police told him that they had received several reports of sightings of a similar object the previous evening in multiple locations in the region.

    Pienaar and another farmer, Chap Smit, then drove back to the spot where he had seen the strange craft. Upon arrival they noticed that the ground was much too hot to touch and that there was a chloroform-like odour in the area.

    21. Brazil, 5 October 1996
    While flying in his own plane, at 10:15 am businessman Haroldo Westendorff encountered a huge unidentified aerial object. He flew his aircraft very close to the object and observed it for more than ten minutes. The object had a base the size of a football stadium (about 100 metres in diameter), was 50 to 60 metres high, and shaped like a cone with eight corners. Suddenly the top of the UFO opened, a flying saucer exited vertically, the saucer tilted at 45 degrees and then it shot upward at great speed.

    In response to Westendorff’s radio report while flying around the UFO, Airton Mendes da Silva (Infraero operator in the control room of the Empresa Brasileira de Infra-Estrutura Airport) and his assistants Gilberto Martins dos Santos and Jorge Renato S. Dutra went outside and saw the object in the East sector towards runway 15/33.

    22. USA, 7 November 2006
    At approximately 16:15 CST on 7 November 2006, federal authorities at Chicago O’Hare International Airport received a report that twelve airport employees were witnessing a metallic, saucer-shaped craft hovering over Gate C-17. The object was first spotted by a ramp employee who was pushing back United Airlines Flight 446. The employee told Flight 446’s crew of the object above their aircraft. The object was also witnessed by pilots, airline management and mechanics. No air traffic controllers saw the object and it did not show up on radar. The disc was visible for about five minutes.

    Witnesses described the object as completely silent, 6 to 24 feet (1.8 to 7.3 m) in diameter and dark grey in colour. Several independent witnesses outside the airport also saw the object. One described a disc-shaped craft hovering over the airport and said it shot through the clouds at high velocity, leaving a clear blue hole in the cloud layer.

    The National Aviation Reporting Center on Anomalous Phenomena (NARCAP) published a 155-page report on the sighting and called for a government inquiry and improved energy-sensing technologies: “Anytime an airborne object can hover for several minutes over a busy airport but not be registered on radar or seen visually from the control tower, constitutes a potential threat to flight safety.”

    23. Mexico, 2 May 2009
    At about 5:15 pm on 2 May 2009, in daylight against a blue sky in the Valle Dorado area, Pedro Hernandez filmed a yellowish, jelly-like object releasing about 20 to 30 smaller objects along a horizontal axis running to the left and to the right of the object. The film was aired on Mexican TV in May 2009.

    Some weeks later, another film of the same event emerged. It was shot by Alfredo Carrillo, who was clearly on the other side of the object. Hernandez’s film was shot with the sun reflecting off the object, whereas Carrillo’s film was shot looking more in the direction of the sun, i.e. the objects appeared more as silhouettes.

    24. USA, 20 January 2015
    Videos filmed by Navy pilots show two encounters with flying objects. One was captured by a plane’s camera off the coast of Jacksonville, Florida on 20 January 2015. The footage shows an object tilting like a spinning top moving against the wind. A pilot refers to a fleet of objects. The second video was taken a few weeks later. The objects persisted, showing up at 30,000 feet, 20,000 feet, even sea level. They could accelerate, slow down and then hit hypersonic speeds. Lieutenant Accoin said he interacted twice with the objects. The first time, after picking up the object on his radar, he set his plane to merge with it, flying 1,000 feet below it. He said he should have been able to see it with his helmet camera but could not, even though his radar told him it was there.

    A few days later, Lieutenant Accoin said a training missile on his jet locked on the object and his infrared camera also picked it up. However, “I could not pick it up visually.” The pilots said that the video showed objects accelerating to hypersonic speed, making sudden stops and instantaneous turns — something beyond the physical limits of a human crew.

    25. USA, 21 February 2021
    Shortly after noon, a pilot at an altitude of 37,000 feet reported seeing a long cylindrical object that almost looked like a “cruise missile type of thing” moving really fast right over the top of them according to published audio. American Airlines confirmed that the radio transmission came from flight 2292. FAA a few days later stated: “A pilot reported seeing an object over New Mexico shortly after noon local time on Sunday 21 February 2021.”

    2. Lunar factors in ET craft sightings

    Both Andrew Johnson and Richard D. Hall have noted that ET craft activity seems related to the availability of energy from the natural environment. On page 29 of his book Acknowledged: A perspective on UFOs, Aliens and Crop Circles (2019)1 Andrew Johnson discusses video (downloaded from a NASA shuttle) of what seems to be intelligently-controlled craft maneuvering in the upper atmosphere and interacting with thunderstorms. Focusing on a different source of energy, in a RichPlanet TV video (2017) Richard Hall3 features an ET craft videoed hovering over a mountain in Wales and notes the possibility of lunar factors associated with ET craft activity in relation to their use of telluric current. Telluric current, also known as Earth current, is electrical current that travels over large areas at or near the surface of Earth.4 According to Santos et al. (2011),5 the telluric field does indeed oscillate according to tides (forces of the Moon cause sea levels to rise and fall) and the telluric field induced by tides spreads out far inland. Similarly, Kolvankar et al. (2010)6 found that earthquake counts go up steadily from apogee to perigee and also toward full Moon. Greater numbers of major earthquakes occur when perigee coincides with full Moon and new Moon than at apogee with similar combination.

    On the basis of the above, I analysed the dates of the 145 ET craft encounters in relation to phases of the Moon and the Moon’s perigee – apogee cycle. The online Lunar Perigee and Apogee Calculator7 was used to determine perigee and apogee dates and times, Calendar-12.com8 was used to determine Moon phases, and the online Chi-Square Calculator for Goodness of Fit at Social Science Statistics9 was used to calculate the statistics.

    2.1 Findings

    ET craft sightings: Lunar cycle and phase



    Figure 1a. No. of ET craft sightings per day across lunar cycle.
    Figure 1b. No. of ET craft sightings per lunar phase.

    In Figure 1a light blue shading demarcates the lunar phases. Notable features of this chart: a spike in ET craft sightings at the start of Last Quarter (LQ), after which the number of cases tails off until the end of New Moon (NM).

    Figure 1b shows the relatively high number of sightings during Last Quarter. Yellow shading highlights the difference between First Quarter (the phase with fewest cases) and Last Quarter (the phase with most cases). The Chi^2 value for the difference between these two phases is 3.753. The p-value is .05271, i.e. almost significant at p < .05. This finding indicates that ET craft sightings were more likely to occur during Last Quarter than First Quarter. The next biggest difference between lunar phases (Last Quarter – New Moon, Chi^2 value 2.45, p-value .11752) is notable but not significant at p < .05.

    Summary: ET craft sightings by lunar phase

    Most ET craft sightings occurred during Last Quarter. The difference between the number of cases during First Quarter (fewest cases) and Last Quarter (most cases) was almost significant at p < .05.



    ET craft sightings: Perigee-apogee cycle and lunar phase

    Figure 2a. No. of ET craft sightings per day across perigee-apogee cycle.
    Figure 2b. No. of ET craft sightings by lunar phase and closest point (perigee or apogee) in perigee-apogee cycle.

    In Figure 2a light blue shading demarcates the cases that occurred closer to perigee from those that occurred closer to apogee. Notable feature of this chart: More cases occurred closer to apogee than closer to perigee. The Chi^2 value for the difference between these two groups is 3.648. The p-value is .05613. The difference is almost significant at p < .05.

    In Figure 2b yellow shading highlights differences between certain lunar phase and perigee-apogee categories. The Chi^2 and p-values for the difference between these groups:

    Last Quarter with the Moon closer to Perigee vs Last Quarter with the Moon closer to Apogee (Chi^2 value 1.723, p-value .18926). This difference is not significant at p < .05.

    Last Quarter with the Moon closer to Apogee vs New Moon with the Moon closer to Perigee (Chi^2 value 7.41, p-value .00649). This difference is significant at p < .01. The finding indicates that ET craft encounters were more likely to occur during Last Quarter with the Moon closer to Apogee rather than during New Moon with the Moon closer to Perigee.

    New Moon with the Moon closer to Perigee vs New Moon with the Moon closer to Apogee (Chi^2 value 3.667, p-value .05551). This difference is almost significant at p < .05. The finding indicates that ET craft encounters were more likely to occur during New Moon when the Moon was closer to Apogee rather than Perigee.

    Summary: Perigee-apogee and lunar phase findings

    There was a tendency for the ET craft to be seen when the Moon was further from Earth (closer to Apogee), particularly during Last Quarter and New Moon.

    Consistency of findings

    Figure 3. No. of ET craft sightings by lunar phase and closest point (perigee or apogee) in perigee-apogee cycle: Pre-1970, Pre-1990, All cases.

    In order to assess the consistency of these findings across time, I separately analysed the incidents that occurred pre-1970 (58 cases) and pre-1990 (95 cases). The distribution of Pre-1970 cases (when there were no ET-type craft flown by humans) shows the surge in ET craft sightings when the Moon was further from Earth (closer to Apogee) during Last Quarter and to a lesser extent at New Moon. Similarly, the distribution of Pre-1990 cases (when the risk of including a case of human-controlled anti-gravity craft in the 1970 to 1989 period was present but low) shows the surge in ET craft sightings when the Moon was further from Earth during Last Quarter and to a lesser extent at New Moon, a profile that persists in the distribution of all 145 cases. The consistency of these findings indicates that this Apogee factor is associated with ET craft.

    Chi^2 and p-values for the differences highlighted in yellow:

    Pre-1970

    Last Quarter with the Moon closer to Perigee vs Last Quarter with the Moon closer to Apogee (Chi^2 value 2, p-value .1573). This difference is not significant at p < .05.

    Last Quarter with the Moon closer to Apogee vs New Moon with the Moon closer to Perigee (Chi^2 value 2.882, p-value .08956.). Although this difference is not significant at p < .05, it approaches significance at that level.

    New Moon with the Moon closer to Perigee vs New Moon with the Moon closer to Apogee (Chi^2 value 0.692, p-value .40538). This difference is not significant at p < .05).

    Pre-1990

    Last Quarter with the Moon closer to Perigee vs Last Quarter with the Moon closer to Apogee (Chi^2 value 2.455, p-value .11719). This difference is not significant at p < .05.

    Last Quarter with the Moon closer to Apogee vs New Moon with the Moon closer to Perigee (Chi^2 value 9.846, p-value .0017). This difference is significant at p < .01.

    New Moon with the Moon closer to Perigee vs New Moon with the Moon closer to Apogee (Chi^2 value 3.556, p-value .05935). This difference is almost significant at p < .05).

    Interpretation of the lunar findings

    1. Lunar factors (particularly lunar phase in combination with the perigee-apogee cycle) are significantly related to the dates of these ET craft sightings. The consistency of these findings over time supports the view that this Apogee factor is associated with ET craft activity and not man-made ET-type craft activity.
    2. The lunar findings support the view of Richard Hall that ET craft activity is associated with lunar factors.
    3. I am not in a position to do more than speculate about ETs’ apparent preference for flying in the vicinity of Earth during Last Quarter (especially) and New Moon when the Moon is further from Earth. Perhaps the preference is due to higher levels of telluric current being available at those times or increased stability of the current due to reduced tidal range at apogee (the telluric field and tidal motion was referred to above in relation to Santos et al. 2011).

    3. Technical aspects of ET craft operation

    Bob Lazar (1959 — ) worked as a physicist at the S-4 facility (underground, inside the Papoose Mountains, near Area 51) for about six months as of early 1989. In an interview (1989)10 he described the operation of the ET craft that he studied:

    • It produces a gravity wave similar to the gravity wave Earth produces.
    • The craft phase-shifts the wave so that it works against the natural gravity wave of the Earth and produces a lift effect.
    • There are three amplifiers. The craft can operate on a single one to lift off the ground.
    • Propulsion is by means of Omicron configuration, where the craft is using one generator or a Delta configuration where it’s using all three for space travel.
    • For space travel, the craft tilts up on its side, focuses the three gravity generators to a single point, and essentially rolls down hill for infinity by chasing a little distortion.
    • For the above reason, these craft behave strangely when flying at low speed near Earth because the gravity field of Earth is not constant and stable. Depending on the minerals and density of the earth underneath, the gravity will vary somewhat. Therefore you get odd movements of the craft. Low speed mode is relatively unstable.
    • The ET craft produces no exhaust but there is a high voltage discharge from the craft. Therefore they appear as glowing balls of light in the night sky. Even close up you would see a glowing halo around the craft.
    • The ET craft can be invisible because its gravitational field bends light. From underneath the craft and other vantage points, the viewer might only see what is above the craft.
    • The ET craft is virtually noiseless, i.e. it is possible for the craft to be relatively close to a potential observer without being seen or heard.

    In the same interview Bob Lazar stated the following about Element 115:

    • It is a strictly extraterrestrial material. It is virtually impossible to make any usable quantity of such a heavy element on Earth.
    • Element 115 is in the top of the reactor.
    • At the base of the reactor is a particle accelerator. A particle accelerated to high speed is aimed at the 115. This causes a radiation of anti-matter that reacts with matter and converts to 100% heat energy.
    • The heat energy is converted to electrical power by a thermal electric converter in the reactor.
    • This electricity powers sub-systems on the craft.
    • Bombarding the 115 also produces a gravitational wave at the top of the reactor.
    • The gravitational wave is guided to an amplifying cavity and then through projectors that are in the bottom of the craft.
    • As Element 115 is stable, it is not radioactive, i.e. it does not pose a radiation danger to the crew.
    • At the time of the interview (1989) he understood that the military had acquired 500 lbs of Element 115.
    • Possibly the military’s Element 115 arrived in one of the ET craft.

    4. The 145 ET craft encounters: Notable features

    • Immobilization and disintegration. ETs can (a) immobilize / paralyse animals (including humans) and (b) neutralize the force holding objects together and potentially cause them to disintegrate.
    • Invisibility. ETs can cloak their craft and render them invisible to the naked eye and radar.
    • Electrical malfunction. Electrical devices can be rendered inoperative in the vicinity of ET craft.
    • Resilience against human attack. In general (not always) ET craft do not seem to be affected by conventional weapons. However they can be brought down by radar / laser-type weapons.
    • Defensive hostility. ET craft will potentially respond with hostility (e.g. destroying the aircraft and its occupants) when approached by human military aircraft. In contrast, ET craft can be (not always) tolerant of approach by civilian aircraft.
    • Inadvertent harm to life. Close-range exposure to ET craft can result in serious biological harm, e.g. damage to plants, humans and other animals.
    • Speed and maneuverability. Extreme speed and maneuverability of ET craft is demonstrated.
    • Water. ET craft can travel and remain underwater for many days at least.
    • Size range. There is a wide range in ET craft sizes, from huge mother-ships to relatively small objects no bigger than a 44-gallon drum.
    • Monitoring / intervention. In part ET craft seem to be present in places of human military activity, including preparation for war and war. There is also evidence of ET opposition to such activity.

    5. Why are ET craft here?

    The answer to this question likely varies somewhat according to the ET species in control of the craft. However in general the reason is likely the same as the reason for ETs’ presence on Earth since before they created humans, i.e. (a) use of Earth’s resources (mineral and biological), including the use of this planet as one of their homes / bases in our solar system and (b) management of Earth’s resources, including (i) monitoring the state of Earth-based life (individual species and ecosystems) and (ii) intervention in ways that they consider beneficial to Earth and themselves, e.g. nudging an asteroid so that it strikes Earth to alter habitats and ecosystems, triggering volcanic eruptions to melt ice sheets and thereby change conditions on Earth, and genetic engineering to create new forms of life (including humans) that serve the ETs’ goals.

    6. Where do the ET craft come from?

    According to authorities on this subject such as those cited below, the immediate origins of ET spacecraft seen in the vicinity of Earth are:

    • Outer space — including mother-ships in the vicinity of Earth.
    • Bases on Earth — independent of human support (e.g. underground or underwater in remote parts of oceans) or dependent on human support (e.g. at military installations).

    Support for independent ET bases on Earth is provided by cases such as these:

    • An ET spacecraft was seen exiting a cavern system near the Russian border.11
    • The crew of a Russian nuclear submarine in the South Pacific encountered a formation of six disc-shaped ET spacecraft at a depth of about 260 metres and travelling at over 265 miles per hour directly toward the submarine. After the submarine then surfaced, the spacecraft were seen leaving the water and flying away at extremely high speed.12

    Evidence for ET bases on Earth that are dependent on human support is provided by sources such as these:

    • Former naval intelligence officer William Cooper wrote13 that the United States Government constructed underground bases in Utah, New Mexico, Arizona and Colorado for use by a certain ET nation (the Greys presumably).
    • Similarly, on 29 August 2014, Linda Moulton Howe,14 quoting from the book UFO Highway by Anthony F. Sanchez, stated the following on her website: There really is an underground ET cloning and hybridization lab near Dulce, New Mexico. The “Dulce Grey ET Facility” is allegedly underground Archuleta Mesa and Mt. Archuleta, New Mexico.
    • In a RichPlanet TV documentary15 Richard Hall refers to information about such a base within a mountain in Brecon Beacons, Wales.

    7. Summary of main points

    1. Many people, including highly credible witnesses, have seen ET craft near and on Earth and provided supporting evidence, e.g. video and radar.
    2. Lunar factors (particularly lunar phase in combination with the perigee-apogee cycle) were significantly related to the dates of these ET craft sightings.
    3. For certain reasons, possibly related to availability of energy from the natural environment, ETs showed a preference for flying in the vicinity of Earth during Last Quarter (especially) and New Moon when the Moon was further from Earth (nearer apogee).
    4. Technical and other aspects of ET craft were highlighted.
    5. The purpose and origin of ET craft on Earth were discussed.
    6. In particular, it was noted that some ET craft appear to originate from outer space while others seem to originate from bases on Earth, either independent of human support or dependent on human support.
    7. At least in the USA, but perhaps more widely, Grey ETs are living on Earth with human support, i.e. they are in partnership with the Cabal.

    8. References

    1. Johnson, Andrew (2019). Acknowledged: A perspective on UFOs, Aliens and Crop Circles.
    2. Hall, Richard D. (2019). Manchester Appeal & And Mute Mystery PART 2 OF 4, RichPlanet TV.
    3. Hall, Richard D. (2017). Starchild Skull & NATO Facility, RichPlanet TV.
    4. Wikipedia: Telluric current
    5. Santos, F. A. M., Nolasco, R., Marta-Almeida, M., Soares, A., Bernado, I., Luzio, R., Dubert, J., & Dias, J. M. (2011). The telluric field induced by tidal motion: A review of the Portuguese experience. In Sea level rise, coastal engineering, shorelines and Tides, Ed. Linda L. Wright.
    6. Kolvankar, V. G., Deshpande, S. S., Manjre, A. S., Pansare, S., More, S., & Thakur, N. (2010). Lunar periodicities and earthquakes, New Concepts in Global Tectonics, Newsletter, no. 56, September, 2010.
    7. Lunar Perigee and Apogee Calculator
    8. Calendar-12.com
    9. Chi-Square Calculator for Goodness of Fit, Social Science Statistics.
    10. Bob Lazar Full Length Interview on Area 51, Element 115 & UFOs (1989).
    11. Hall, Richard D. (2015). UFOs and NATO: The Human Mutilation Cover Up, Part 2 of 3, 16 Jul 2015, RichPlanet TV. Unfortunately YouTube deleted this channel.
    12. UFOs: The Lost Evidence (2020). Quest TV, 21 Sep 2020.
    13. Cooper, William (1990). Behold a Pale Horse.
    14. Moulton Howe, Linda (2014). Earth Files, 29 Aug 2014.
    15. Hall, Richard D. Derek Gough 2011 Interview, RichPlanet TV.

    9. Appendix

    List of 145 ET-type spacecraft sighting reports
    [a 259 kB text file of 120 pages for download]


    Family from afar